From bugs@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 4 17:01:11 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:01:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1911] New: cookie decoding goes wrong Message-ID: <20070904160111.4180A2808B7@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1911 Summary: cookie decoding goes wrong Product: SOPE Version: TRUNK Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: sope-appserver - general AssignedTo: helge.hess@opengroupware.org ReportedBy: wsourdeau@inverse.ca QAContact: znek@mulle-kybernetik.com CC: bugs@opengroupware.org The code for decoding the cookie after the salt is wrong, causing the base64 decoding to return a bad authentication check. The attached patch fixes that. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 4 17:02:04 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:02:04 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1911] cookie decoding goes wrong Message-ID: <20070904160204.24E2828011C@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1911 ------- Additional Comments From wsourdeau@inverse.ca 2007-09-04 18:02 ------- Created an attachment (id=568) --> (http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=568&action=view) the patch ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 4 18:36:37 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 19:36:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1911] cookie decoding goes wrong Message-ID: <20070904173637.4A0672808B7@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1911 wsourdeau@inverse.ca changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #568 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From wsourdeau@inverse.ca 2007-09-04 19:36 ------- Created an attachment (id=569) --> (http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=569&action=view) Another patch which also fixes SoHTTPAuthenticator for the same problem ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 5 15:39:03 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:39:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1907] folder creation is not portable Message-ID: <20070905143903.2349F2808B7@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1907 ------- Additional Comments From wsourdeau@inverse.ca 2007-09-05 16:39 ------- The following method should be replaced in GCSFolderManager.m after applying the initial patch: - (NSString *)baseTableNameWithUID:(NSString *)_uid { NSDate *now; unichar currentChar; unsigned int count, max, done; NSMutableString *newUID; newUID = [NSMutableString string]; now = [NSDate date]; max = [_uid length]; done = 0; count = 0; while (done < 8 && count < max) { currentChar = [_uid characterAtIndex: count]; if ([asciiAlphaNumericCS characterIsMember: currentChar]) { [newUID appendFormat: @"%c", currentChar]; done++; } count++; } return [NSString stringWithFormat: @"%@%u", newUID, [now timeIntervalSince1970]]; } ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 5 15:42:21 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:42:21 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1907] folder creation is not portable Message-ID: <20070905144221.DB0D128011C@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1907 ------- Additional Comments From wsourdeau@inverse.ca 2007-09-05 16:42 ------- Another bug causes the folder creation to fail: in sope-gdl1/Oracle8/OracleAdaptorChannel.m: the definition for c_deleted should be "NULL" instead of "NOT NULL". Same thing in PostgreSQL/PostgreSQL72Channel.m. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 5 15:52:37 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:52:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1907] folder creation is not portable Message-ID: <20070905145237.AA0082808B7@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1907 wsourdeau@inverse.ca changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #565 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From wsourdeau@inverse.ca 2007-09-05 16:52 ------- Created an attachment (id=570) --> (http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=570&action=view) New path The patch has been redone to match what was mentionned above. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 10 00:32:26 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 01:32:26 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 397] Enh: allow reassignment of tasks (forward to someone else) Message-ID: <20070909233226.9DB662808E5@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=397 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |awilliam@whitemice.org ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 10 00:32:50 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 01:32:50 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 398] Enh: show tasklist in scheduler Message-ID: <20070909233250.CD36B2808E4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=398 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |awilliam@whitemice.org ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 10 01:55:32 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 02:55:32 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 615] Enh: notify task properties not available via XML-RPC Message-ID: <20070910005532.C57742808E4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=615 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-10 02:55 ------- This attribute can be set/unset via putObject function of the zOGI API. zOGI has been commited to ZideStore. Perhaps this means this bug can be closed; the solution is adequate for me. :) But this bug was specifically files against the ogo-xmlrpcd API. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 10 02:49:08 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:49:08 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 814] wish: "last annotated by" column Message-ID: <20070910014908.1E0E62808E5@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=814 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From roti@al.pmmf.hu 2004-06-24 07:59 ------- >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Opera/7.51 (Windows NT 5.1; U) [en] Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Ogo is great, we use it almost every day. But I miss a small addon: At the list of a project's tasks, there should be a column "last annotated", indicating who was the last person who annotated the task. It would speed up the search for the recent accessed tasks. For = example at 100 progressing tasks, it is hard to find the 10 last annotated. Additional info: ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-10 03:49 ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 815 *** ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 10 02:49:10 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:49:10 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 815] Enh: "last annotated by" column Message-ID: <20070910014910.C4C6C2808E5@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=815 helge.hess@opengroupware.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|1.0 |1.2 ------- Additional Comments From helge.hess@opengroupware.org 2004-11-16 15:09 ------- => moved to 1.2 milestone ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-10 03:49 ------- *** Bug 814 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 10 02:52:37 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:52:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1561] log IP of conecting user Message-ID: <20070910015237.271362808E5@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1561 ------- Additional Comments From olivier@ig.com.br 2005-09-06 15:42 ------- Description of problem: It will be nice that besides the login name and time, we get also the IP of the conecting user Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): trunk How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: admin only logs time, user and login/logout Expected results: show also the IP of the conecting user, improving auditability. Additional info: Seems that this infromation is already in the logs, but it will be nice to have it in the admin log tab list. ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-10 03:52 ------- The IP seen by Apache is extremely unreliable; most likely a proxy server but also NAT can all make this value useless. If this information is needed for auditing it seems more appropriate to me to get it from the underlying systems (apache or iptables). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 10 12:16:28 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:16:28 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 932] Notification mail subject always states "job created" Message-ID: <20070910111628.8B5432808E6@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=932 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-10 13:16 ------- Seems simple enough: - (NSString *)emailSubjectForJobEO:(id)_job { NSString *subject; if ([[_job valueForKey:@"name"] isEqualToString:@"00_created"]) subject = [NSString stringWithFormat:@"%@: '%@' %@ %@", [[self labels] valueForKey:@"job"], [_job valueForKey:@"name"], [[self labels] valueForKey:@"createLabel"], [[[self session] activeAccount] valueForKey:@"login"]]; else subject = [NSString stringWithFormat:@"%@: '%@' %@ %@", [[self labels] valueForKey:@"job"], [_job valueForKey:@"name"], [[self labels] valueForKey:@"editedLabel"], [[[self session] activeAccount] valueForKey:@"login"]]; return subject; } Requires creation of an editedLabel in the strings, for English - editedLabel = "edited by" ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Fri Sep 14 11:17:10 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:17:10 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1854] Wrong date/time on new tasks & subsequent task actions Message-ID: <20070914101710.ADC0A280972@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1854 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-14 12:15 ------- In OGo Defaults: TimeZoneName = GMT; In PostgreSQL's postgresql.conf: TimeZoneName = GMT; In user's defaults: TimeZoneName = GMT; Creating a task at 06:02 posts the task at 10:02. job_history.action_date = '2007-09-14 05:02:05.0' job.start_date = '2007-09-13 23:00:00.0' Columns in PostgreSQL are all "timestamp with time zone not null" same as in the date_x tables (and times are correct in scheduling application) Time on subsequent annotations & actions show the same issue. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Fri Sep 14 11:24:57 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:24:57 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1854] Wrong date/time on new tasks & subsequent task actions Message-ID: <20070914102457.5CDF5280972@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1854 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Wrong Default start date on |Wrong date/time on new tasks |new tasks |& subsequent task actions CC| |awilliam@whitemice.org ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Fri Sep 14 11:32:13 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:32:13 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1911] cookie decoding goes wrong Message-ID: <20070914103213.ECF41280972@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1911 helge.hess@opengroupware.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From helge.hess@opengroupware.org 2007-09-14 12:32 ------- I don't think the patches are correct. A basic authentication string looks like: Authorization: Basic XYZ Where XYZ is the base64 encoded pair (login:password). So [auth substringFromIndex:6] looks exactly right?! (skip basic, skip the space) Maybe the generation of the cookie is wrong (misses the space). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Fri Sep 14 11:39:58 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:39:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1911] cookie decoding goes wrong Message-ID: <20070914103958.AD858280972@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1911 helge.hess@opengroupware.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From helge.hess@opengroupware.org 2007-09-14 12:39 ------- OK, I made the auth processing more tolerant in #1538 (please check), but the real issue is the code which generates the incorrect cookie. Probably this code is inside SOGo? Just add a space after the "basic". ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Fri Sep 14 14:56:01 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:56:01 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1911] cookie decoding goes wrong Message-ID: <20070914135601.1EA0F280973@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1911 ------- Additional Comments From wsourdeau@inverse.ca 2007-09-14 15:55 ------- You are probably right. I didn't consider that basic and the hash needed to be separated by a space. I will fix SOGo right away. Thanks! ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 17 13:42:00 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:42:00 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1913] New: person.isAccount & person.imAddress attribute unavailable via participants list Message-ID: <20070917124200.CFAEF2809B4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1913 Summary: person.isAccount & person.imAddress attribute unavailable via participants list Product: OpenGroupware.org Version: TRUNK Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Contacts AssignedTo: qa@opengroupware.org ReportedBy: awilliam@whitemice.org QAContact: qa@opengroupware.org CC: bugs@opengroupware.org Description of problem: The person.isAccount & person.imAddress attributes, although in the model, are not available from the appointment::list-participants command. E-mail addresses are available via the extendedAttributes attribute; these other attributes would be useful for alerting [only] users of upcoming appointments. http://mail.opengroupware.org/pipermail/developer/2007-September/003177.html ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 17 13:42:49 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:42:49 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1913] person.isAccount & person.imAddress attribute unavailable via participants list Message-ID: <20070917124249.589612809B4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1913 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-17 14:42 ------- Created an attachment (id=571) --> (http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=571&action=view) Adds person.isAccount and person.imAddress to supported attributes ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Thu Sep 20 11:08:19 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:08:19 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1913] person.isAccount & person.imAddress attribute unavailable via participants list Message-ID: <20070920100819.909C8280A41@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1913 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RESOLVED ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-20 12:08 ------- Applied in r2019 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Fri Sep 21 06:33:54 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:33:54 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1914] New: Enhancement: add possibility to choose AND or OR search operator for SkyProject4DocumentSearch -- with patch Message-ID: <20070921053354.44813280A70@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1914 Summary: Enhancement: add possibility to choose AND or OR search operator for SkyProject4DocumentSearch -- with patch Product: OpenGroupware.org Version: TRUNK Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: normal Component: Project AssignedTo: qa@opengroupware.org ReportedBy: sebastia@l00-bugdead-prods.de QAContact: qa@opengroupware.org CC: bugs@opengroupware.org >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.5; Linux) KHTML/3.5.7 (like Gecko) Description of problem: per default the SkyProject4DocumentSearch is set to be an AND connector. This enhancement allows the user in the webui to decide whether AND or OR operator for the fields should be used. *strings for English and German included. This is mostly copied from LSWPersonAdvancedSearch. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): all How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Additional info: ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Fri Sep 21 06:34:38 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:34:38 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1914] Enhancement: add possibility to choose AND or OR search operator for SkyProject4DocumentSearch -- with patch Message-ID: <20070921053438.6976F280A70@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1914 ------- Additional Comments From sebastia@l00-bugdead-prods.de 2007-09-21 07:34 ------- Created an attachment (id=572) --> (http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=572&action=view) the patch the patch for the enhancement ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Fri Sep 21 17:42:25 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:42:25 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1914] Enhancement: add possibility to choose AND or OR search operator for SkyProject4DocumentSearch -- with patch Message-ID: <20070921164225.E0EB6280A71@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1914 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-21 18:42 ------- Patch touches the following files: opengroupware.org/WebUI/Project/OGoProject/SkyProject4DocumentSearch.m opengroupware.org/WebUI/Resources/English.lproj/OGoProject.strings opengroupware.org/WebUI/Resources/German.lproj/OGoProject.strings opengroupware.org/WebUI/Templates/OGoProject/SkyProject4DocumentSearch.html opengroupware.org/WebUI/Templates/OGoProject/SkyProject4DocumentSearch.wod ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Sat Sep 22 05:05:20 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:05:20 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1914] Enhancement: add possibility to choose AND or OR search operator for SkyProject4DocumentSearch -- with patch Message-ID: <20070922040520.273D5280AB4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1914 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RESOLVED ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-22 06:05 ------- Committed in r2022 svn ci WebUI/Project/OGoProject/ChangeLog WebUI/Project/OGoProject/Version WebUI/Project/OGoProject/SkyProject4DocumentSearch.m WebUI/Resources/ChangeLog WebUI/Resources/English.lproj/OGoProject.strings WebUI/Resources/German.lproj/OGoProject.strings WebUI/Templates/ChangeLog WebUI/Templates/OGoProject/SkyProject4DocumentSearch.html WebUI/Templates/OGoProject/SkyProject4DocumentSearch.wod ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Sat Sep 22 15:50:30 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:50:30 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1793] Appointment notes not available via RPC Message-ID: <20070922145030.053CE280AB4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1793 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RESOLVED ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-22 16:50 ------- Committed in r2023 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Sun Sep 23 05:02:27 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 06:02:27 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1870] cannot add person to favorites tab anymore Message-ID: <20070923040227.0D0BA280AE4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1870 helge.hess@opengroupware.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|qa@opengroupware.org |helge.hess@opengroupware.org ------- Additional Comments From helge.hess@opengroupware.org 2007-05-16 22:59 ------- Yes, I can confirm this. I also see this, but thought that it is a MacOS issue. ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-23 06:02 ------- Does this bug exist after the fix applied on 2007-09-17 / r2014 to OGoListComponent.m? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 24 16:33:04 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:33:04 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1915] New: LSDateAssignmentCommand replaces rather than updates existing assignments Message-ID: <20070924153304.EBB20280B11@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1915 Summary: LSDateAssignmentCommand replaces rather than updates existing assignments Product: OpenGroupware.org Version: TRUNK Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Scheduler AssignedTo: qa@opengroupware.org ReportedBy: awilliam@whitemice.org QAContact: qa@opengroupware.org CC: bugs@opengroupware.org >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.5) Gecko/20061023 SUSE/2.0.0.5-1.1 Firefox/2.0.0.5 Description of problem: Doing an appointment::set with a participants key removes & inserts participant assignments; in some cases this causes loss of assignment attributes like comment and status if the update did not include those values. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): TRUNK How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Update an appointment without modifying participants via XML-RPC, or in some cases with zOGI. Actual Results: Assignment attributes are lost. Expected Results: Record would be updated in place leaving unprovided values as-is. Additional info: LSDateAssignmentComment already contains a TODO note to this effect. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 24 16:38:42 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:38:42 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1915] LSDateAssignmentCommand replaces rather than updates existing assignments Message-ID: <20070924153842.76942280B11@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1915 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-24 17:34 ------- Created an attachment (id=573) --> (http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=573&action=view) Modifies LSDateAssignmentCommand to use update on existing records. Also adds support for "comment" attribute. ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-24 17:38 ------- Committed in r2026 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 24 17:06:09 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:06:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 757] Enh: add tableviews/lists in scheduler Message-ID: <20070924160609.8FDEB28011C@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=757 ------- Additional Comments From je@skyrix.com 2007-09-24 18:06 ------- I would like a list view to have a quick overview showing me when I lastly met a contact... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 24 17:30:23 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:30:23 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 757] Enh: add tableviews/lists in scheduler Message-ID: <20070924163023.3C6BE280B12@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=757 helge.hess@opengroupware.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |low ------- Additional Comments From helge.hess@opengroupware.org 2007-09-24 18:30 ------- Search for the contact in the persons application, and choose the "appointments" tab. It shows the meetings with the contact in a tableview (or as a week overview). Anyways, a tableview would be nice nevertheless (and not very hard to add either). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 24 18:51:13 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:51:13 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 757] Enh: add tableviews/lists in scheduler Message-ID: <20070924175113.EBD6F280B13@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=757 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-24 19:51 ------- The appointments tab in the Contact view seems to focus on the future not the past. It shows all the appointments for the current week to a month in the future. I thought there was an open bug about making this range configurable, but I can't seem to find it now. SkyPersonViewer.m ----------------- // TODO: need a date selection over here sd = [[self weekStart] beginOfDay]; ed = [[sd dateByAddingYears:0 months:1 days:-1] endOfDay]; q = [[[SkyAppointmentQualifier alloc] init] autorelease]; [q setStartDate:sd]; [q setEndDate:ed]; [q setTimeZone:[[self session] timeZone]]; person = [[self person] valueForKey:@"globalID"]; [q setCompanies:[NSArray arrayWithObject:person]]; [q setResources:[NSArray array]]; ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 24 21:41:03 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:41:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 757] Enh: add tableviews/lists in scheduler Message-ID: <20070924204103.71FAB280B42@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=757 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-24 22:41 ------- Relates to Bug#35 Enh: appointment viewer in OGo contacts does not contain navigation buttons (SX 330) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 25 13:37:22 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:37:22 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1916] Support non-participant role for teams regarding conflict detection Message-ID: <20070925123722.A24AB280B40@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1916 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-25 14:36 ------- >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.5) Gecko/20061023 SUSE/2.0.0.5-1.1 Firefox/2.0.0.5 Description of problem: A team participant with a role of non-participant should not produce a conflict for team or team members. Use non-participant teams is useful for informationally posting an event onto the calendar view of a group. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): TRUNK How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: I have user A who is member of team X. I create an appointment with a participant of X and a role of NON-PARTICIPANT. I create an overlapping appointment with a participant of A and a role of REQ-PARTICIPANT. Actual Results: I see a conflict. Expected Results: My understanding was that a role of NON-PARTICIPANT would suppress conflict. Additional info: The same is true if I create an appointment with A:NON-PARTICIPANT and another overlapping appointment with A:REQ-PARTICIPANT. The NON-PARTICIPANT appointment sees a conflict with the REQ-PARTICIPANT appointment but the REQ-PARTICIPANT does not see a conflict with the NON-PARTICIPANT appointment. Shouldn't conflicts always appear from both sides? My understanding of conflicts is from the map: Conflict-Map as implemented in the conflicts command: CHAIR REQ-PART OPT-PART NON-PART NEEDS-ACTI yes yes might no yes yes yes might no yes ACCEPTED yes yes yes no yes DECLINED no no no no no TENTATIVE yes yes yes no yes DELEGATED no no no no no ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-25 14:37 ------- >From helge - > I see a conflict. > Is this a bug? My understanding was that a role of NON-PARTICIPANT > would suppress conflict. Hm. Possibly. Actually I'm not sure whether groups work with those extended status codes. (you usually flatten groups when you want to use the extended stuff because the 'confirm' stuff only makes sense with individual participants, but of course NON-PARTICIPANT seems reasonable). > The same is true if I create an appointment with A:NON-PARTICIPANT and > another overlapping appointment with A:REQ-PARTICIPANT. The > NON-PARTICIPANT appointment sees a conflict with the REQ-PARTICIPANT > appointment but the REQ-PARTICIPANT does not see a conflict with the > NON-PARTICIPANT appointment. > > Shouldn't conflicts always appear from both sides? This is a good question :-) For REQ vs OPT vs NON-PART - probably. But for status values, I'm not sure - eg if a value is tentative it might depend which direction you check. > My understanding of conflicts is from the map: > Conflict-Map as implemented in the conflicts command: > CHAIR REQ-PART OPT-PART NON-PART > NEEDS-ACTION yes yes might no yes > yes yes might no yes > ACCEPTED yes yes yes no yes > DECLINED no no no no no > TENTATIVE yes yes yes no yes > DELEGATED no no no no no Puh. This is 3 year old code :-) The SQL pattern seems to be this one: pattern = @"(%A > %@) AND (%A < %@) " @"AND (%A = 0 OR %A IS NULL) " @"AND (%A = 0 OR %A IS NULL) " @"AND ((%A IN (%@)) AND " // conflict for NEED-INFO CHAIR and REQ-PART events and then for all // ACCEPTED/TENTATIVE events (unless used with a non-part) // args: stat, stat, role, role, role, stat, stat, role // TODO: move to an own qualifier which is static and conjoined? @"(((%A IS NULL OR %A = 'NEEDS-ACTION') AND " @" (%A = 'CHAIR' OR %A = 'REQ-PARTICIPANT' OR %A IS NULL)) " @" OR " @" ((%A = 'ACCEPTED' OR %A = 'TENTATIVE') AND " @" (NOT %A = 'NON-PARTICIPANT')))" @")" ; And it seems to use directed joins. Not sure, probably a review of all that stuff would make sense. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 25 13:59:16 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:59:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1915] LSDateAssignmentCommand replaces rather than updates existing assignments Message-ID: <20070925125916.EA3CB280B40@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1915 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RESOLVED ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-25 14:59 ------- Change committed, forgot to set status to resolved. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 26 11:02:24 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:02:24 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1669] ogo admin unable to release a locked file from a user Message-ID: <20070926100224.F2C54280B70@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1669 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-26 12:02 ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 826 *** ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 26 11:02:28 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:02:28 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 826] Enh: root cannot release locked documents Message-ID: <20070926100228.A962928011C@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=826 ley@debian.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |1.2 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sebastia@l00-bugdead- | |prods.de ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-26 12:02 ------- *** Bug 1669 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 26 12:18:12 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:18:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1917] automatic account locking on failed login attempts is broken Message-ID: <20070926111812.76ED1280B6F@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1917 ------- Additional Comments From sebastia@l00-bugdead-prods.de 2007-09-26 13:15 ------- >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.5; Linux) KHTML/3.5.7 (like Gecko) SUSE Description of problem: With autolock accounts for failed login attemtps enabled like this: HandleFailedAuthorizations YES MinutesBetweenFailedLogins 15 FailedLoginCount 3 FailedLoginLockInfoMailAddress ogoroot after the first failed login attempt, all login attempts, not only for the account that entered a wrong password, are not working anymore until the webui is restarted. on subsequent attemtps, regardless whether with correct or incorrect password, the following shows up in the logs: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.enable HandleFailedAuthorizations 2.login with wrong password 3.see unable to login with subsequent attempts Actual Results: HandleFailedAuthorizations is broken Expected Results: HandleFailedAuthorizations should work Additional info: The sourcecode for the failed-login feature is in OGoContextManager+FailedLogin.m and needs quite some cleanup ... ------- Additional Comments From sebastia@l00-bugdead-prods.de 2007-09-26 13:18 ------- I forgot the logs when someone tries to login after the account is locked: Sep 26 13:00:50 ogo-webui-1.1 [22463]: OGoContextManager: could not begin database transaction Sep 26 13:00:50 ogo-webui-1.1 [22463]: >DirectAction> access denied for user ogouser. Sep 26 13:00:50 ogo-webui-1.1 [22463]: <<0x0x7eb84584[WOForm]>>D Note: session-id is requested, but no session is active? 212.204.56.174 - - [26/Sep/2007:13:00:50 GMT] "POST /OpenGroupware.woa/x/login?da=&o=1190804439 HTTP/1.1" 200 1519/143 0.294 5362 71% - ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 26 19:19:20 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:19:20 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1918] New: add searchoperator to the document search in SkyProject4Desktop with patch Message-ID: <20070926181920.3F76D280B9E@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1918 Summary: add searchoperator to the document search in SkyProject4Desktop with patch Product: OpenGroupware.org Version: TRUNK Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: normal Component: Project AssignedTo: qa@opengroupware.org ReportedBy: sebastia@l00-bugdead-prods.de QAContact: qa@opengroupware.org CC: bugs@opengroupware.org >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.5; Linux) KHTML/3.5.7 (like Gecko) Description of problem: the patch to add the ability for the user to either match all or one search operator in the document search in SkyProject4Desktop class. The radio buttons are below the input fields, the search button moved from the right also below the input fields. A similar facelift is done to SkyProject4DocumentSearch.html. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Additional info: ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 26 19:22:51 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:22:51 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1918] add searchoperator to the document search in SkyProject4Desktop with patch Message-ID: <20070926182251.DB87C280B9E@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1918 ------- Additional Comments From sebastia@l00-bugdead-prods.de 2007-09-26 20:22 ------- Created an attachment (id=574) --> (http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=574&action=view) add sortoperator to document search the described patch ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Sat Sep 29 13:58:15 2007 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:58:15 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1917] automatic account locking on failed login attempts is broken Message-ID: <20070929125815.A77A6280BCD@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1917 sebastia@l00-bugdead-prods.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RESOLVED ------- Additional Comments From helge.hess@opengroupware.org 2007-09-26 14:58 ------- possibly fixed in r2031, please check ------- Additional Comments From sebastia@l00-bugdead-prods.de 2007-09-29 14:58 ------- tested r2031, and works well now. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.