From bugs@opengroupware.org Tue Jul 1 01:37:06 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 02:37:06 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1595] GroupDAV PUT for tasks is not implemented Message-ID: <20080701003706.223FCCBF45@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1595 helge.hess@opengroupware.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|creating and editing tasks |GroupDAV PUT for tasks is |doesn't work from kontact |not implemented Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|KOrganizer |GroupDAV Target Milestone|--- |1.4 ------- Additional Comments From helge.hess@opengroupware.org 2005-10-18 14:16 ------- Known issue. GroupDAV PUT for tasks is prepared but not yet (fully) implemented. ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-01 02:37 ------- Is this issue a duplicate of Bug#1308? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Wed Jul 2 00:06:20 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 01:06:20 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1989] Multi-day events do not appear until a calendar reload/refresh Message-ID: <20080701230620.96586CBF44@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1989 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-02 01:06 ------- Created an attachment (id=659) --> (http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=659&action=view) Client/Server Exchange for creation of a multi-day appointment Response seems OK, and nothing special happens. Perhaps this really is a bug in Sunbird? Even navigating back and forth months doesn't make the event appear. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Wed Jul 2 14:41:09 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 15:41:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1990] WOKeyPathAssociation.m:937: A backsync raises the exception when there is no accessor (gnustep-port) Message-ID: <20080702134109.44748CBF46@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1990 ------- Additional Comments From Golovin.SV@gmail.com 2008-07-02 15:39 ------- >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080221 Firefox 1.5 Description of problem: Hi! There is a chunk of code: -------------------------------------------------------------------b // we do not check the return value, because a set is allowed to fail // (in SOPE ;-) [if there is no accessor, a backsync is just ignored] #if 1 _setValue(self, _value, _component); #else if (!_setValue(self, _value, _component)) { [self logWithFormat:@"could not set value %@ component %@", _value, _component]; } #endif -------------------------------------------------------------------e It doesn't work with gnustep (i believe (according to the comment) it is assumed lF) and raises exception when i want to step in a project (see "Actual Result"). The backtrace is attached. I managed to see the project with a test case (see attached patch). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): SVN_REVISION:1621, library-combo:gnu-gnu-gnu How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create a project 2. Try to step the project in 3. Actual Results: Application Server caught exception: session: 1818181801486B551B element: 005486b5520097e3668.0.17.1.3.b.attributes.1 context: <0x0x97e3668[WOContext]: 005486b5520097e3668 app=ogo-webui-1.1 sn=1818181801486B551B eid=005486b5520097e3668.0.17.1.3.b.attributes.1 rqeid=(nil)> request: class: NSException name: NSUnknownKeyException reason: Unable to set nil value for key info: {NSTargetObjectUserInfoKey = "\"; name = \"\\U041F\\U0440\\U043E\\U0435\\U043A\\U0442\"; number = P10501; objectVersion = 3; ownerId = 10111; projectId = 10501; startDate = \"2008-06-30 22:00:00 +0000\"; status = \"\"; teamId = \"\"; url = \"skyrix://SERVER0/\"; }>"; NSUnknownUserInfoKey = object; } Expected Results: I expected to see the created project Additional info: I'm not along having to deal with the problem: http://mail.opengroupware.org/pipermail/gnustep-port/2007-November/000116.html ------- Additional Comments From Golovin.SV@gmail.com 2008-07-02 15:41 ------- Created an attachment (id=660) --> (http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=660&action=view) Backtrace ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Wed Jul 2 14:43:09 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 15:43:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1990] WOKeyPathAssociation.m:937: A backsync raises the exception when there is no accessor (gnustep-port) Message-ID: <20080702134309.B7DBDCBF46@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1990 ------- Additional Comments From Golovin.SV@gmail.com 2008-07-02 15:43 ------- Created an attachment (id=661) --> (http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=661&action=view) 5 minute hack With this patch been applied i can see the created project ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Wed Jul 2 14:56:54 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 15:56:54 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1990] WOKeyPathAssociation.m:937: A backsync raises the exception when there is no accessor (gnustep-port) Message-ID: <20080702135654.A8D8BCBF45@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1990 helge.hess@opengroupware.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 ------- Additional Comments From helge.hess@opengroupware.org 2008-07-02 15:56 ------- Yeah, its really a hack (and makes everything much slower). You need to override the proper handleQueryForUnboundKey method and return nil. See the KVC documentation at Apple. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Wed Jul 2 16:38:12 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 17:38:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1338] Conflicting events are not created using iCal-over-HTTP (pending patch) Message-ID: <20080702153812.0F3F4CBF45@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1338 helge.hess@opengroupware.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Conflicting events are not |Conflicting events are not |created using iCal-over-HTTP|created using iCal-over-HTTP | |(pending patch) awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-02 17:38 ------- Creating overlapping appointments via Sunbird/Lightning on current trunk works without incident. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Wed Jul 2 16:43:14 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 17:43:14 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1989] Events do not appear on Lightning until remote calendar reload. Message-ID: <20080702154314.AE885CBEC4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1989 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Multi-day events do not |Events do not appear on |appear until a calendar |Lightning until remote |reload/refresh |calendar reload. AssignedTo|helge.hess@opengroupware.org|awilliam@whitemice.org ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-02 17:40 ------- New events, multi-day or not do not appear in the Lightning calendar until the calendar is reloaded. Yet both single day and multi-day events immediately appear in Sunbird (stand alone). Lightning does not appear to refresh view after a PUT. ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-02 17:43 ------- This is Lightning 0.8 in Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 And Sunbird 0.8 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Wed Jul 2 16:46:05 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 17:46:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1989] Events do not appear on Lightning until remote calendar reload. Message-ID: <20080702154605.472F4CBEC4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1989 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-02 17:45 ------- Created an attachment (id=662) --> (http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=662&action=view) Lightning 0.8 add-on creating an event. ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-02 17:46 ------- Created an attachment (id=663) --> (http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=663&action=view) Sunbird 0.8 creating a new event. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Wed Jul 2 22:44:50 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 23:44:50 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1876] Sunbird Alerts cannot be dismissed Message-ID: <20080702214450.C0806CBF44@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1876 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|helge.hess@opengroupware.org|awilliam@whitemice.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-06-30 04:33 ------- Possibly relates to SQL error in saving the reminder. Jun 30 02:31:26 ogo-zidestore-1.5 [3154]: <<0x0x8860b8c[SxAppointment]>>D patch old=>new 13=>0 Jun 30 02:31:26 ogo-zidestore-1.5 [3154]: <0x0x8667614[PostgreSQL72Channel]: connection=<0x0x845b114[PGConnection]: connection=0x0x8667e98>>: message: WARNING: nonstandard use of \' in a string literal LINE 1: ... null, associated_contacts = null, evo_reminder = '\'DISPLAY... ^ HINT: Use '' to write quotes in strings, or use the escape string syntax (E'...'). ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-02 23:44 ------- There is no SQL error, the issue regarding quoting is merely a warning. Probably this should be fixed in the PostgreSQL adapter. I think the issue is this - BEGIN:VALARM TRIGGER;VALUE=DURATION:-P1W X-MOZ-LASTACK:20080702T211432Z DESCRIPTION:Mozilla Alarm: hfhfdhd ACTION:DISPLAY END:VALARM A dismiss in Mozilla sets a X-MOZ-LASTACK attribute. This is *not* encoded into the evoReminder, then ZideStore dutifully returns - BEGIN:VALARM ACTION:DISPLAY DESCRIPTION:Mozilla Alarm: hfhfdhd TRIGGER;VALUE=DURATION;RELATED=START:-P1W END:VALARM ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Thu Jul 3 06:49:06 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:49:06 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1990] WOKeyPathAssociation.m:937: A backsync raises the exception when there is no accessor (gnustep-port) Message-ID: <20080703054906.676C9CBF46@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1990 ------- Additional Comments From Golovin.SV@gmail.com 2008-07-03 07:49 ------- #6 0x0035d277 in -[WOKeyPathAssociation setValue:inComponent:] (self=0x97fe558, _cmd=0x45a110, _value=0x98d50e8, _component=0x96be838) at WOKeyPathAssociation.m:937 937 _setValue(self, _value, _component); (gdb) p [[_component className] cString] $9 = 0x99e23b0 "SkyProject4Viewer" (gdb) down #5 0x0035d08f in _setValue (self=0x97fe558, _value=0x98d50e8, root=0x96be838) at WOKeyPathAssociation.m:912 912 [object setValue:_value forKey:info->extra.key]; (gdb) p [[object className] cString] $11 = 0x9a07d98 "GSDictionary" First occurence of the -setValue:forKey is in the function _setValue() in WOKeyPathAssociation.m:912. At that point call goes to gnustep out, where the exception raises then. So i don't get the proper place for -handleQueryForUnboundKey: because i don't understand the code around _setValue(), _objectify(), _getValueN() yet. May be something like the category for GSDictionary makes sense? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Thu Jul 3 10:48:20 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 11:48:20 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1990] WOKeyPathAssociation.m:937: A backsync raises the exception when there is no accessor (gnustep-port) Message-ID: <20080703094820.00088CBF46@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1990 ------- Additional Comments From Golovin.SV@gmail.com 2008-07-03 11:48 ------- I believe there is another error. It is triggered by the assotiation in SkyProject4Viewer.wod: FSInfo: SkyProjectInlineViewer { project = fileSystemAttributes.object; // TODO: quite a hack! fix it <-- the problem trigger showClip = NO; showSend = NO; } "fileSystemAttributes" is NSDictionary. A KVC-call is preferred for such objects (according to WOKeyPathAssotiation.m). Though SkyProject4Viewer has method "object" which pulls "object" via the "exception-safe" method -objectForKey: on "fileSystemAttributes". "project = object" is working. May be it is a solution? :-) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Thu Jul 3 12:33:37 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:33:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1990] WOKeyPathAssociation.m:937: A backsync raises the exception when there is no accessor (gnustep-port) Message-ID: <20080703113337.5088CCBF46@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1990 ------- Additional Comments From Golovin.SV@gmail.com 2008-07-03 12:03 ------- I'm wrong. There are problems with any assotiations which uses fileSystemAttributes. ------- Additional Comments From Golovin.SV@gmail.com 2008-07-03 13:33 ------- I found only one place where -handleQueryForUnboundKey: does matter (by enhancing a category as i pointed out). It is sope-core/NGExtensions/FdExt.subproj/NSDictionary+misc.m. But i don't imagine how it affects other things. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Thu Jul 3 12:41:58 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:41:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1990] WOKeyPathAssociation.m:937: A backsync raises the exception when there is no accessor (gnustep-port) Message-ID: <20080703114158.D9849CBF46@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1990 Golovin.SV@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #661 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From Golovin.SV@gmail.com 2008-07-03 13:41 ------- Created an attachment (id=664) --> (http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=664&action=view) The patch for handling unbound keys ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Thu Jul 3 20:52:25 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 21:52:25 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1876] Sunbird Alerts cannot be dismissed Message-ID: <20080703195225.936DECBF44@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1876 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-03 21:52 ------- Created an attachment (id=665) --> (http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=665&action=view) Patch to add X-MOZ-LASTACK support to SOPE's iCalAlarm object. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Fri Jul 4 05:11:12 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 06:11:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1990] WOKeyPathAssociation.m:937: A backsync raises the exception when there is no accessor (gnustep-port) Message-ID: <20080704041112.AAAEECBF46@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1990 ------- Additional Comments From Golovin.SV@gmail.com 2008-07-04 06:11 ------- I don't know developer's intention about KVC on such objects like NSDictionary but may be someone simply forgot renew the template SkyProject4Viewer.wod after adding methods [SkyProject4Viewer object], [SkyProject4Viewer fileSystemNumber] and forgot to add [SkyProject4Viewer fileSystemName] method? Anyway assotiations like "project = fileSystemAttributes.object" where fileSystemAttributes is the NSDictionary instance require improving KVC in NSDictionary. It is not a matter of the particular object somewhere in SOPE or OGo. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Fri Jul 4 08:41:23 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:41:23 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1990] WOKeyPathAssociation.m:937: A backsync raises the exception when there is no accessor (gnustep-port) Message-ID: <20080704074123.6D33ECBEC4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1990 ------- Additional Comments From sebastia@l00-bugdead-prods.de 2008-07-04 08:02 ------- Hi, I am the one who pushed the gnustep-port up to what it is right now. I got stuck on these unbound key exceptions, but as I can see, you seem to have more understanding of it than I do. Maybe Helge can give some hints regarding the KVC of dictionary objects. In case you have patches, I'd be happy to test these or help out otherwise to get ogo running with gnu-gnu-gnu. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Fri Jul 4 08:52:30 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:52:30 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1990] WOKeyPathAssociation.m:937: A backsync raises the exception when there is no accessor (gnustep-port) Message-ID: <20080704075230.45B0FCBF45@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1990 ------- Additional Comments From Golovin.SV@gmail.com 2008-07-04 09:41 ------- it is a pity I don't have the solid view of the issue. Helge has :-) . So ... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Fri Jul 4 09:41:34 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 10:41:34 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1990] WOKeyPathAssociation.m:937: A backsync raises the exception when there is no accessor (gnustep-port) Message-ID: <20080704084134.200C2CBF46@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1990 ------- Additional Comments From helge.hess@opengroupware.org 2008-07-04 09:52 ------- Bugzilla is not good for discussing things, please move that part to the mailing list. The short story from my perspective is: OGo works with libFoundation AND it works very well with various Cocoa versions. Hence, the issue is an incompatible KVC implementation in gstep-base, which needs to be fixed. I'm seeing occasional KVC keys issues on Cocoa, but they are always fixed easily. The biggest difference between modern KVC and the approach OGo uses is that we often do not raise exceptions in the handleQueryForUnboundKey style methods, but just return nil. This behaviour is added to eg Cocoa using categories (by overriding the necessary methods). Wrt to NSDictionary (and EOGenericRecord which is similiar). Its pretty easy, they return the values for the requested keys, instead of invoking object methods. No black magic here. And finally WOKeyPathAssociation: this has an own, caching, KVC implementation for performance reasons. There is also a subclass which uses plain KVC (WOSystemKeyPathAssoc or something like that), but this should be much slower. ------- Additional Comments From Golovin.SV@gmail.com 2008-07-04 10:41 ------- > This behaviour is added to eg Cocoa using categories (by overriding the necessary methods). If i modify the last patch (the category for NSDictionary) with appropriate #ifdef-constructions will it be accepted? Or should i go to gstep-base? :-) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Sat Jul 5 12:41:44 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 13:41:44 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1989] Events do not appear on Lightning until remote calendar reload. Message-ID: <20080705114144.DF4D3CBEC4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1989 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-05 13:41 ------- Change to SOPE committed in r1625 which adds lastACK to iCalAlarm object; this is decoded from the X-MOZ-LASTACK attribute which is a GMT time encoded as a string. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Sat Jul 5 18:08:29 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 19:08:29 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1976] deleting contatcts, enterprises or tasks, does not delete records from the obj_link table Message-ID: <20080705170829.0FFF0CBF45@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1976 ------- Additional Comments From sebastia@l00-bugdead-prods.de 2008-06-26 07:10 ------- tested last patch, and everything seems to be fine, besides one glitch: whatever is deleted as the last thing doesn't matter, either appointment or project, then the traces of the note disappear from the database, thats fine, but the text file, containing the contents of the note will still stay on the filesystem in LSAttachmentPath/.txt I think, it should be removed too. ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-05 19:08 ------- LSDeleteAppointmentCommand commited in r2124 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Sat Jul 5 18:43:50 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 19:43:50 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1876] Sunbird Alerts cannot be dismissed Message-ID: <20080705174350.CF8C0CBF44@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1876 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-05 19:43 ------- Created an attachment (id=667) --> (http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=667&action=view) Resolves bug. Patch to store and encode X-MOX-LASTACK value in evoReminder Stores the X-MOZ-LASTACK (if present) in the evoReminder CSV and renders the value in the VALARM (if present) in the get-ical command. Sunbird alarms can be dismissed. However, changing an appointment to have no alarm does not remove the alarm. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Sat Jul 5 18:44:52 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 19:44:52 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1876] Sunbird Alerts cannot be dismissed Message-ID: <20080705174452.6DD80CBF44@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1876 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RESOLVED ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-05 19:44 ------- Issue is resolved; the alarm dismissal is processed in the best manner possible (X-MOZ-LASTACK itself is a hack in Sunbird/Lightning). Also alarms are stored on event creation. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Sat Jul 5 19:41:47 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 20:41:47 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1991] New: Important/Priority value is discarded Message-ID: <20080705184147.19881CBF44@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1991 Summary: Important/Priority value is discarded Product: ZideStore Version: TRUNK Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Mozilla-Calendar AssignedTo: helge.hess@opengroupware.org ReportedBy: awilliam@whitemice.org CC: bugs@opengroupware.org >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0) Gecko/2008061600 SUSE/3.0-0.1 Firefox/3.0 Description of problem: The PRIORITY (called "Importance" in Mozilla Calendar) is discarded at server. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): TRUNK How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Set the importance for an appointment and save Actual Results: Importance goes back to default and is not saved in database. Expected Results: Importance (PRIORITY:) would be preserved and saved in database. Additional info: There is an "importance" field in the database and the priority field is supported in sope-ical. Rendering importance as PRIORITY is even support in LSGetICalForAppointmentsCommand (appointment::get-ical). There is just no way to save the value [except maybe via ZideLook??]. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Sat Jul 5 19:51:56 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 20:51:56 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1991] Important/Priority value is discarded Message-ID: <20080705185156.456D2CBF44@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1991 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|helge.hess@opengroupware.org|awilliam@whitemice.org ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-05 20:51 ------- Taking bug ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Sat Jul 5 20:18:18 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 21:18:18 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1991] Important/Priority value is discarded Message-ID: <20080705191818.B6371CBF44@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1991 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-05 21:18 ------- Fix applied in r2127. Note that this also causes a value to be set for the "X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE" attribute via appointment::get-ical. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Sat Jul 5 20:32:37 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 21:32:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1992] New: Organizer & User Duplication On Update Message-ID: <20080705193237.DFC54CBF45@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1992 Summary: Organizer & User Duplication On Update Product: ZideStore Version: TRUNK Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Mozilla-Calendar AssignedTo: helge.hess@opengroupware.org ReportedBy: awilliam@whitemice.org CC: bugs@opengroupware.org >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0) Gecko/2008061600 SUSE/3.0-0.1 Firefox/3.0 Description of problem: When an appointment is created organizer & user (participant) are singular. But as soon as an appointment is updated the user participant record is duplicated as is the organizer record. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): TRUNK How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create an appointment, save it 2. Update the appointment Actual Results: Organizer and attendee record for user are duplicated. Expected Results: participant and organizer records would be unique. Additional info: Appointment after creation: BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VEVENT LOCATION:fhjfjhf STATUS:CONFIRMED SUMMARY:hfh DESCRIPTION:hfjhf\njjfj DTSTART:20080704T160000Z DTEND:20080704T170000Z TRANSP:OPAQUE UID:skyrix://linux-nnci.site/linux-nnci/11537 CREATED:20030710T120000Z DTSTAMP:20080705T192431Z X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:0 X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:BUSY X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INSTTYPE:0 X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE ATTENDEE;CUTYPE="INDIVIDUAL";PARTSTAT="NEEDS-ACTION";ROLE="REQ-PARTICIPANT";RSVP="FALSE";CN="Adam Williams":MAILTO:adam@localhost ORGANIZER;CN="Adam Williams":MAILTO:adam@localhost END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR Appointment after update: BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VEVENT LOCATION:fhjfjhf STATUS:CONFIRMED SUMMARY:hfh DESCRIPTION:hfjhf\njjfj DTSTART:20080704T160000Z DTEND:20080704T170000Z TRANSP:OPAQUE UID:skyrix://linux-nnci.site/linux-nnci/11537 CREATED:20030710T120000Z LAST-MODIFIED:20080705T192457Z DTSTAMP:20080705T192457Z X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:0 X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:BUSY X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INSTTYPE:0 X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE ATTENDEE;CUTYPE="INDIVIDUAL";PARTSTAT="NEEDS-ACTION";ROLE="REQ-PARTICIPANT";RSVP="FALSE";CN="Adam Williams":MAILTO:adam@localhost ORGANIZER;CN="Adam Williams":MAILTO:adam@localhost ATTENDEE;CUTYPE="INDIVIDUAL";PARTSTAT="NEEDS-ACTION";ROLE="REQ-PARTICIPANT";RSVP="FALSE";CN="Adam Williams":MAILTO:adam@localhost ORGANIZER;CN="Adam Williams":MAILTO:adam@localhost END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR Records only seem to double, they don't triple or multiply further. Duplication propgates to date_company_assignment like - OGo=> select company_id, date_id, is_staff, partstatus, role, rsvp, db_status from date_company_assignment where date_id = 11537; company_id | date_id | is_staff | partstatus | role | rsvp | db_status ------------+---------+----------+--------------+-----------------+------+----------- 10102 | 11537 | 0 | | | | inserted 10102 | 11537 | 1 | NEEDS-ACTION | REQ-PARTICIPANT | 0 | updated 10401 | 11537 | 0 | | | | inserted ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Sat Jul 5 20:35:42 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 21:35:42 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1992] Organizer & User Duplication On Update Message-ID: <20080705193542.5E67DCBF44@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1992 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|helge.hess@opengroupware.org|awilliam@whitemice.org ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-05 21:35 ------- Taking bug. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Sun Jul 6 01:15:03 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 02:15:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1992] Organizer & User Duplication On Update Message-ID: <20080706001503.9B2D0CBEC4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1992 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-06 02:15 ------- Duplicate organizer attribute is the result of the duplicate creator participant record; this determined by commenting out the bit of appointment::get-ical that renders the organizer. So duplication in the db is happening first. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Sun Jul 6 02:41:08 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 03:41:08 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1992] Organizer & User Duplication On Update Message-ID: <20080706014108.A4BEBCBEC4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1992 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-06 03:41 ------- No duplication in Db occurs during creation. User's participant record is duplicated upon update; the existing record is not updated, a new record is inserted. OGo=> select company_id, date_id, is_staff, partstatus, role, rsvp, db_status from date_company_assignment; company_id | date_id | is_staff | partstatus | role | rsvp | db_status ------------+---------+----------+--------------+-----------------+------+----------- 10102 | 11566 | 0 | | | | inserted <<<<<< Creation 10102 | 11566 | 1 | NEEDS-ACTION | REQ-PARTICIPANT | 0 | inserted <<<<<< Update Why is is_staff = 0 on initial record? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Sun Jul 6 16:16:38 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 17:16:38 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1991] Important/Priority value is discarded Message-ID: <20080706151638.9FC00CBEC4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1991 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-06 14:34 ------- http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms530502(EXCHG.10).aspx The scale of PR_IMPORTANCE is different: /* PR_IMPORTANCE values */ #define IMPORTANCE_LOW ((long) 0) #define IMPORTANCE_NORMAL ((long) 1) #define IMPORTANCE_HIGH ((long) 2) ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-06 17:16 ------- r2128 translates the priority ("date_x.importance") field range 9..0 to the X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE scale to 0 .. 2 in LSGetICalForAppointmentsCommand. - if (![(tmp = [_date valueForKey:@"importance"]) isNotNull]) tmp = @"0"; - [self _appendName:@"X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE" andValue:tmp toICal:_iCal]; + if ([(tmp = [_date valueForKey:@"importance"]) isNotNull]) { + int priority = [tmp intValue]; + if ((priority < 5) && (priority > 0)) { + [self _appendName:@"X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE" + andValue:@"2" + toICal:_iCal]; + } else if ((priority < 9) && (priority > 0)) { + [self _appendName:@"X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE" + andValue:@"1" + toICal:_iCal]; + } else { + [self _appendName:@"X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE" + andValue:@"0" + toICal:_iCal]; + } + } /* end X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE */ ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Sun Jul 6 17:04:46 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 18:04:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1995] TRANSP value is discarded Message-ID: <20080706160446.ABA43CBEC4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1995 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-05 22:33 ------- >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0) Gecko/2008061600 SUSE/3.0-0.1 Firefox/3.0 Description of problem: the value of the TRANSP attribute is lost; this is the "Show Time As" option of the appointment. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): TRUNK How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Set a show-time-as other than Busy (aka free) 2. Save appointment Actual Results: TRANSP value is discarded on the server. Expected Results: TRANSP value be preserved. Additional info: A value of "TRANSP:TRANSPARENT" is sent to the server and a value of "TRANSP:OPAQUE" is returned. Relates to Bug#1655 ("Support exact FBTYPEs in VFREEBUSY response") and possibly other deficiencies in conflict detection like Bug#1916 and Bug#1862 >From RFC2445 ------------------------ 4.8.2.7 Time Transparency Property Name: TRANSP Purpose: This property defines whether an event is transparent or not to busy time searches. Value Type: TEXT Property Parameters: Non-standard property parameters can be specified on this property. Conformance: This property can be specified once in a "VEVENT" calendar component. Description: Time Transparency is the characteristic of an event that determines whether it appears to consume time on a calendar. Events that consume actual time for the individual or resource associated with the calendar SHOULD be recorded as OPAQUE, allowing them to be detected by free-busy time searches. Other events, which do not take up the individual's (or resource's) time SHOULD be recorded as TRANSPARENT, making them invisible to free-busy time searches. Format Definition: The property is specified by the following notation: transp = "TRANSP" tranparam ":" transvalue CRLF tranparam = *(";" xparam) transvalue = "OPAQUE" ;Blocks or opaque on busy time searches. / "TRANSPARENT" ;Transparent on busy time searches. ;Default value is OPAQUE Example: The following is an example of this property for an event that is transparent or does not block on free/busy time searches: TRANSP:TRANSPARENT The following is an example of this property for an event that is opaque or blocks on free/busy time searches: TRANSP:OPAQUE ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-06 18:04 ------- Supported in iCalEvent (SOPE's NGiCal). - (void)setTransparency:(NSString *)_transparency { ASSIGNCOPY(self->transparency, _transparency); } - (NSString *)transparency { return self->transparency; } Appears to be supported in the SAX map transp = { class = NSString; key = transparency; }; ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Jul 7 01:35:20 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 02:35:20 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1995] TRANSP value is discarded Message-ID: <20080707003520.E75DACBEC4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1995 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-07 02:35 ------- TRANSP: OPAQUE = X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS: BUSY TRANSP: TRANSPARENT = X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS: FREE Default to OPAQUE/BUSY if no value is provided or the database field is NULL. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Jul 7 01:43:41 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 02:43:41 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1995] TRANSP value is discarded Message-ID: <20080707004341.6DE68CBEC4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1995 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-07 02:43 ------- r2129 presents the value from the database (if any) in the iCalendar data created by LSGetICalForAppointmentsCommand. If database field is null default is OPAQUE/BUSY. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Jul 7 03:02:07 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 04:02:07 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1995] TRANSP value is discarded Message-ID: <20080707020207.C99E6CBEC4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1995 awilliam@whitemice.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RESOLVED ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-07-07 04:02 ------- Transparency is preserved as of r2120. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Jul 7 03:02:12 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 04:02:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1916] Support non-participant role for teams regarding conflict detection Message-ID: <20080707020212.18BFDCBF44@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1916 ------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2007-09-25 14:40 ------- Relates to Bug#1262 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Jul 7 03:02:16 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 04:02:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1862] No Resource Conflict Report for Recurring Events Message-ID: <20080707020216.D1B88CBF45@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1862 ------- Additional Comments From cgreatorex@lextranet.com 2007-04-04 17:55 ------- >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20070126 Ubuntu/dapper-security Firefox/1.5.0.9 Description of problem: When booking a new single event and requesting a specific resource, you do not get a resource conflict report if there is a recurring event using the same resource at the same time. More specifically... Assume you have a recurring event that is scheduled for 1130 every Wednesday, and which uses a resource called "Conference Room". If you try to schedule a new single event for the same time, using the same resource, the program will not report a conflict on the resource, and will allow you to double-book that resource. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0beta.2-1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create a recurring event that uses a resource. 2. Create a new single event for the same time, using the same resource. 3. Save the new event. Actual Results: The new event will be saved, with no report on the resource conflict Expected Results: The new resource conflict report should appear as it does when booking two conflicting single events. Additional info: ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Jul 7 19:38:33 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 20:38:33 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1996] New: Enh: Support FB URLs for contacts & accounts Message-ID: <20080707183833.00139CBEC4@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1996 Summary: Enh: Support FB URLs for contacts & accounts Product: ZideStore Version: TRUNK Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: normal Component: general AssignedTo: awilliam@whitemice.org ReportedBy: awilliam@whitemice.org CC: bugs@opengroupware.org >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0) Gecko/2008061600 SUSE/3.0-0.2 Firefox/3.0 Description of problem: A contact's Free/Busy URL should be preserved to the database's person.freebusy_url when updated via iCalendar (note: the WebUI does not provide access to this field???) For a contact that is an account ZideStore should generate the URL on behalf of the user. Free/Busy requests can be honored via a URL like - http://gourd-amber/zidestore/so/freebusy?name=adam@morrison-ind.com&server=aleph - a server value MUST be specified or the query failed *BUT* any value can be used for the server value (scratches head...) Would be nice to make nice per-user VFBs like those requested in Bug#377 for this. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): TRUNK How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Get a vCard from ZideStore Actual Results: No FB-URL, for accounts or otherwise. Expected Results: Get a working VFB URL for account contacts, potentially get a VFB for contacts. Additional info: Relates to mail thread at http://mail.opengroupware.org/pipermail/users/2008-January/018540.html ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Tue Jul 8 12:26:35 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 13:26:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 3] serious testbug... Message-ID: <20080708112636.0F2694F04213@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3 ------- Additional Comments From frank@opengroupware.org 2008-07-08 13:23 ------- Testerdetest! ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Tue Jul 8 12:30:00 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 13:30:00 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 3] serious testbug... Message-ID: <20080708113000.2C1674F04213@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3 ------- Additional Comments From frank@opengroupware.org 2008-07-08 13:26 ------- asd ------- Additional Comments From frank@opengroupware.org 2008-07-08 13:29 ------- aaa ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Tue Jul 8 12:42:54 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 13:42:54 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 3] serious testbug... Message-ID: <20080708114254.6CAD54F04213@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3 ------- Additional Comments From frank@opengroupware.org 2008-07-08 13:42 ------- test ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Wed Jul 9 11:12:07 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:12:07 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1666] make 'normal' appointment from 'all day' appointment Message-ID: <20080709101207.807C74F04078@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1666 jhedlund+ogo@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |u5es8g602@sneakemail.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs@opengroupware.org Mon Jul 14 08:44:41 2008 From: bugs@opengroupware.org (bugs@opengroupware.org) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:44:41 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OGo-Bugs][Bug 1955] Add link to external map service next to addresses -- with patch Message-ID: <20080714074441.E650F118B70@bugzilla.opengroupware.org> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1955 sebastia@l00-bugdead-prods.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #642 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From sebastia@l00-bugdead-prods.de 2008-07-13 22:25 ------- Created an attachment (id=668) --> (http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=668&action=view) updated patch again Now the coordinates, and the address objectVersion are stored in a CSV file in LSAttachmentPath/.csv External lookups are done, when the file does not exist, then the file will be created. Further, when the objectVersion of the address is larger than saved in the file, then the file will be updated with the values of a new external lookup. ------- Additional Comments From sebastia@l00-bugdead-prods.de 2008-07-14 09:44 ------- the changes introduced with the last patch make the patch to bug #1983 necessary, as the decision whether to make an external lookup of the GPS coordinates, it is now based on the objectVersion of the address. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.