[OGo-Bugs][Bug 1974] Enh: Create Jobs links InReplyTo links, replacing referredPerson property
bugs@opengroupware.org
bugs@opengroupware.org
Mon, 19 May 2008 18:01:34 +0200 (CEST)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug
report.
http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1974
------- Additional Comments From awilliam@whitemice.org 2008-05-19 15:39 -------
>From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080410
SUSE/2.0.0.14-0.1 Firefox/2.0.0.14
Description of problem:
Currently there is a semi-operation feature called referred person whereby a job
references a person via a property value.
It is suggested to remove that feature - the link to the person does not appear
properly in the job viewer and the property cannot be deleted. Replace the
feature whereby a job is created with a InReplyTo link to the person on whose
behalf the job was created. This link will appear in the object-links view of
the person and the job.
See http://mail.opengroupware.org/pipermail/developer/2008-May/003519.html and
http://mail.opengroupware.org/pipermail/developer/2008-May/003527.html from mail
archives.
This conversation originated from discussion of Bug#1043
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
TRUNK
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try to create a job referencing a person
Actual Results: Get an ugly looking link on the job page.
Expected Results: Have a link between the job and the person
Additional info:
------- Additional Comments From sebastia@l00-bugdead-prods.de 2008-05-19 18:01 -------
I already have a patch against that ugly link, as it was a small glitch in the
code, ...in case someone cares to fix this, before throwing out ;)
otherwise, I think removing and rebuilding as suggested, might make more
sense.
The patch further changes the label from "lastname, firstname" to "firstname
lastname", because I thought, as owner and creator are shown as "firstname
lastname" it would make sense to have all this consistent.
interested in the patch? Otherwise I'd throw it away, in favour of sth. new
and better
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.