[OGo-Developer] Re: additional field for synchronizatin

[Wolfgang Sourdeau]

> I do not really like that the change states are stored in the table  
> instead of a proper transaction table, but its probably the pragmatic  
> thing to do.
> (querying c_lastmodified (a date) is highly unreliable given that you  
> can have hundreds of updates in a second - which is extremely common  
> especially during synchronizations - which is why there are SyncML  
> anchors ...)

Yes, you can have hundreds of updates in a second, but you'd have to
be a cyborg to be able to do it on the same single event that belongs to you...

the c_lastmodified and the c_deleted fields are per-event. Not per update.


W.