[OGo-Discuss] OGo Directions / Java
Sebastian Reitenbach
discuss@opengroupware.org
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:09:40 +0100
discuss@opengroupware.org wrote:
> On 18.12.2007, at 07:54, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > I did not meant, throwing it away. I don't think so, but do you plan
> > on
> > backporting new features when they get added to JOPE to SOPE?
>
> Why would I do that? Thats left to interested parties (eg ZNeK ported
> quite a few JOPE AJAX features to SOPE).
>
> > Or will it only be maintenance updates, e.g. compatibility updates and
> > bugfixes to SOPE?
> > Or will the code will become "unmaintained", as all the new work is
> > done in
> > the new Java stuff?
>
> That depends on who works on it! I already said what *I'm* going to do
> in my 'sparetime'.
> Most enhancements to the OGo ObjC codebase are sponsored by commercial
> customers anyways. So I suppose it depends on what *they* want to have
> in the future ;-)
ok, got the picture I think.
>
> Notably SOPE is also used by ScalableOGo, so I don't expect it to
> become 'unmaintained' in any way.
ah, right, I forgot about that.
thanks
Sebastian