[OGo-Users] here is apparently how to yum install on fc5
users@opengroupware.org
users@opengroupware.org
Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:58:18 -0400
>> Yes, there are several corners of the web interface that are a bit out
>> of date; it is usually better to head straight for the plone.
>> I've assembled some administrative information here -
>> http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/whitemice/wmogag/file_view
> Thank you so much.
That too is in need of a bit of an update, it'll have a couple more =20
chapters soon.
> I'm currently evaluating Zimbra, and it is very cool, but I am extremely
> discouraged by the fact that it takes over the job of MTA. It makes user
> data much more opaque from a backup and restore point of view. I am
> rather attached to my own MTA customizations and the Maildir format. I
> would like to keep them and their flexibility.
Yep, a colleage of mine looked at Zimbra. It is very "black box"; =20
but the interface is pretty cool (although I wonder if the =20
everything-is-my-inbox model might get annoying with time).
We have a large Cyrus IMAPd server and an intricate sendmail/LDAP =20
configuration (13 companies all share the same resources) so something =20
taking over the entirety of mail would be pretty much a show stopper.
That and Zimbra lacks what every other Open Source 'groupware' =20
solution lacks: an API. You can't automate the import/export of data =20
or integrate with most of the existing alternatives in any =20
straight-forward way.
See the mission statement:
"Mission: To create, as a community, the leading open source groupware =20
server to integrate with the leading open source office suite products =20
and all the leading groupware clients running across all major =20
platforms, and to provide access to all functionality and data through =20
open XML-based interfaces and APIs"
http://www.opengroupware.org/en/about/index.html
For us it actually came down to between Domino and OGo.
> I'm encouraged to see OpenGroupware uses IMAP and doesn't try to be an
> MTA. All I really want is a seamless way to share calendars for users
> and resources, delegate calendar management to administrative
> assistants, and web mail.
> It looks like OGO will fit my need. Fingers crossed...
Feel free to ask any questions.