[OGo-Users] RE: What version of Ogo for Zidelook?

[Adam Tauno Williams]

--=-UsE0PZHfdAKphPZAA9R7
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 12:02 +1000, Mark Pavlichuk wrote:
> >>>/ progressing interoperability /w Sunbird makes me want to deploy it =20
> />>>/ over
> />>>/ Exchange and the other OSS alternatives.  I've purchased Zidelook..=
.
> />>>/ which Ogo release should I install in a production environment?  My
> />>>/ environment is Debian Etch.
> />>/ ZideLook should work with any version of OGo as far as I know.
> >The ZideLook package comes with an own, Outlook specific ZideStore =20
> >server. So it doesn't matter which OGo version you have installed for =20
> >other clients.
>   I presume the nightly build is too unstable to be used in production(?)=
.

Depends. :)  If big changes are made it might be unstable.  But for the
most part the nightlies are solid.  The OGo code base has been around
for a long time so radical changes are very rare.

I run the nightlies is production;  I download the source, build
packages on a test server, run a bunch of tests, and if it passes I
update the production servers.  I've only had to roll back once since
starting to use OGo in 2003.  But I don't update every day - I just
watch the ChangeBlogger and pull down new packages if something
useful/important gets committed.

> I guess the two other alternatives are Ogo 1.0 or the yummy release.
> Recommendation?


--=-UsE0PZHfdAKphPZAA9R7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBGaAEdLRePpNle04MRAp/wAJ9134mUQ4qgc4V7qttgcCIuo2tL9gCdFUbK
N5d0FwI3zt2/M/FBN5eIQUk=
=mFsy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-UsE0PZHfdAKphPZAA9R7--