From users@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 3 08:44:19 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Helge Hess) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 09:44:19 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] take me off the list, please In-Reply-To: <200708311516.39248.ingo@german-connection.org> References: <200708311516.39248.ingo@german-connection.org> Message-ID: On 31.08.2007, at 15:16, ingo wagener wrote: > So can somebody please tell me or take me off, please? Yes, yourself. Just look at the footer of any mail you get from the list ...: http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/users Helge From users@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 3 14:04:01 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (support) Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:04:01 +0100 Subject: [OGo-Users] Some problems with projects Message-ID: <46DC0641.7000402@aspub.com> Hello I'm new to OpenGroupware.org and I'm having some problems : 1- Each time that i create a company, a default project is created ? How to avoid this comportment ? i don't need a project for each created company 2- those auto created projects are DB based projects while I'm working with FS based projects only. If i can't avoid auto created projects, how can i configure OGo to create FS based projects by default ? 3- I can't set access permissions on files and directories of FS created projects documentation, now all projects members that have read permission can read everything ! while i need to protect some documents and to reserve them to projects managers only, How to do this on FS based projects ? Thanks ! From users@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 3 18:32:51 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 13:32:51 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] Some problems with projects In-Reply-To: <46DC0641.7000402@aspub.com> References: <46DC0641.7000402@aspub.com> Message-ID: <5672-SnapperMsg05076A73C301F5CA@[75.219.34.213]> >1- Each time that i create a company, a default project is created ? How >to avoid this comportment ? i don't need a project for each created company This is a feature, the container provided by the project is used by other features. >2- those auto created projects are DB based projects while I'm working >with FS based projects only. If i can't avoid auto created projects, how >can i configure OGo to create FS based projects by default ? To my knowledge all auto created projects are DB projects, and DB projects are what you want 99.44% of the time. >3- I can't set access permissions on files and directories of FS created >projects documentation, now all projects members that have read >permission can read everything ! while i need to protect some documents >and to reserve them to projects managers only, How to do this on FS >based projects ? You can't. Permissions on contained objects and versioing are features of DB projects. FS projects simply overlay the filesystem (fast but dumb). From users@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 4 12:46:58 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Sandy Lelarge) Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:46:58 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] contribute with theme and translation Message-ID: <46DD45B2.8020003@cg51.fr> With my firm we made some new theme and began french translation. Our theme was build from original OGo theme. I wanted to know if we can give them to the community and if yes how ? likely for translation? Best Regards, ****************************************************************************************************************************** Ce message ou ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles a l'intention exclusive de son destinataire et est couvert par le secret professionnel. Toute utilisation, divulgation ou reproduction de son contenu sont strictement interdits. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, merci de le notifier a son expediteur et d'en detruire toute copie. Le present message pouvant-etre altere a notre insu, le conseil général de la Marne ne peut pas etre engage par son contenu. ****************************************************************************************************************************** From users@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 4 13:13:24 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:13:24 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] contribute with theme and translation In-Reply-To: <46DD45B2.8020003@cg51.fr> References: <46DD45B2.8020003@cg51.fr> Message-ID: <1188908004.4929.6.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> --=-vxk91ZjOzcyXxR2T2ASn Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > With my firm we made some new theme and began french translation. > Our theme was build from original OGo theme. I wanted to know if we can > give them to the community=20 Of course! > and if yes how ?=20 Ideally, generate a patch and upload it into bugzilla as an enhancement. Otherwise just tarball the theme folders and attach them to an enhancement bug; we'll take a look at them. A third route, and always available, is to create an account on the docs plone and just upload the theme there for others to download. > likely for translation? I think there is a system in place for handling translations. And there are French translations available, provided by the=20 ogo-webui-resource-fr package (on an RPM system anyway). Did you update the existing translation? --=-vxk91ZjOzcyXxR2T2ASn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBG3UvkLRePpNle04MRAug1AJ9gWdXXenJXZ7Fce9b4sB2/EPzxrACfeHKZ Btv95Jg+o7K8z98IxOBBJcs= =AoXh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vxk91ZjOzcyXxR2T2ASn-- From users@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 4 17:20:35 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Louis-David Mitterrand) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:20:35 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] problem with favorites in nightly builds Message-ID: <20070904162035.GA21612@apartia.fr> Hello, Using the latest nightly builds on debian/etch it is impossible to add a favorite contacts or companies. Clicking on "+" does nothing. Known problem? From users@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 4 17:24:42 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Williams) Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:24:42 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] problem with favorites in nightly builds In-Reply-To: <20070904162035.GA21612@apartia.fr> References: <20070904162035.GA21612@apartia.fr> Message-ID: <1188923082.31463.2.camel@ws01.whitemice.org> > Using the latest nightly builds on debian/etch it is impossible to add a > favorite contacts or companies. Clicking on "+" does nothing. > Known problem? If you are using the nightly builds are you also using SOPE 4.7? From users@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 4 17:41:40 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Louis-David Mitterrand) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:41:40 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] problem with favorites in nightly builds In-Reply-To: <1188923082.31463.2.camel@ws01.whitemice.org> References: <20070904162035.GA21612@apartia.fr> <1188923082.31463.2.camel@ws01.whitemice.org> Message-ID: <20070904164140.GA22235@apartia.fr> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:24:42PM -0400, Adam Williams wrote: > > Using the latest nightly builds on debian/etch it is impossible to add a > > favorite contacts or companies. Clicking on "+" does nothing. > > Known problem? > > If you are using the nightly builds are you also using SOPE 4.7? Yes, precisely 4.7.svn1537-1 Does the problem come from sope? Is it fixable by downgrading it? Thanks, From users@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 4 18:47:22 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:47:22 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] problem with favorites in nightly builds In-Reply-To: <20070904164140.GA22235@apartia.fr> References: <20070904162035.GA21612@apartia.fr> <1188923082.31463.2.camel@ws01.whitemice.org> <20070904164140.GA22235@apartia.fr> Message-ID: <20070904134722.u6wlfzvk9ww8os84@tyr.morrison.iserv.net> >> > Using the latest nightly builds on debian/etch it is impossible to add a >> > favorite contacts or companies. Clicking on "+" does nothing. >> > Known problem? >> If you are using the nightly builds are you also using SOPE 4.7? > Yes, precisely 4.7.svn1537-1 > Does the problem come from sope? Is it fixable by downgrading it? I've seen it before and I thought it corresponded to a problem in SOPE that was later resolved. But it appears to have resurfaced. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1870 It is currently working on my servers however - I am running nightly builds, but not *the* nightly builds (we package ourselves). From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 5 08:09:00 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Sandy Lelarge) Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:09:00 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] contribute with theme and translation In-Reply-To: <1188908004.4929.6.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> References: <46DD45B2.8020003@cg51.fr> <1188908004.4929.6.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> Message-ID: <46DE560C.1090400@cg51.fr> Adam Tauno Williams a écrit : >> With my firm we made some new theme and began french translation. >> Our theme was build from original OGo theme. I wanted to know if we can >> give them to the community >> > > Of course! > Ok, I just wonder if we can cause I thought we can’t use skyrix’s theme for base. > >> and if yes how ? >> > > Ideally, generate a patch and upload it into bugzilla as an > enhancement. Otherwise just tarball the theme folders and attach them > to an enhancement bug; we'll take a look at them. A third route, and > always available, is to create an account on the docs plone and just > upload the theme there for others to download. > > If you can explain me how to create patches I will do it. But for now I will post tarball to bugzilla and post it to docs plone with screenshots. >> likely for translation? >> > > I think there is a system in place for handling translations. And > there are French translations available, provided by the > ogo-webui-resource-fr package (on an RPM system anyway). Did you update > the existing translation? > We are already using ogo-webui-resource-fr package but it is not complete and no very well translated for us. So we began our own. Should I use svn to update the package ? (I don’t know how to us it, perhaps you have some docs ?). Can I post tarball to bugzilla as enhancement too ? (it’s only the gebinning I will post it when some parts will be completed) Note that our translation and theme are build for the actually trunck packages. ****************************************************************************************************************************** Ce message ou ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles a l'intention exclusive de son destinataire et est couvert par le secret professionnel. Toute utilisation, divulgation ou reproduction de son contenu sont strictement interdits. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, merci de le notifier a son expediteur et d'en detruire toute copie. Le present message pouvant-etre altere a notre insu, le conseil général de la Marne ne peut pas etre engage par son contenu. ****************************************************************************************************************************** From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 5 14:35:35 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:35:35 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] contribute with theme and translation In-Reply-To: <46DE560C.1090400@cg51.fr> References: <46DD45B2.8020003@cg51.fr> <1188908004.4929.6.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> <46DE560C.1090400@cg51.fr> Message-ID: <20070905093535.24vd50f4so4kgwo4@tyr.morrison.iserv.net> >>> With my firm we made some new theme and began french translation. >>> Our theme was build from original OGo theme. I wanted to know if we can >>> give them to the community >> Of course! > Ok, I just wonder if we can cause I thought we can=E2=80=99t use skyrix=E2= =80=99s theme > for base. Why not; everything in OpenGroupware.Org is either GPL or LGPL. >> Ideally, generate a patch and upload it into bugzilla as an >> enhancement. Otherwise just tarball the theme folders and attach them >> to an enhancement bug; we'll take a look at them. A third route, and >> always available, is to create an account on the docs plone and just >> upload the theme there for others to download. > If you can explain me how to create patches I will do it. Do create patches you checkout the source (which includes the template =20 and strings files) make your changes and do an "svn diff". > But for now I will post tarball to bugzilla and post it to docs =20 > plone with screenshots. Great. >> I think there is a system in place for handling translations. And >> there are French translations available, provided by the >> ogo-webui-resource-fr package (on an RPM system anyway). Did you update >> the existing translation? > We are already using ogo-webui-resource-fr package but it is not > complete and no very well translated for us. So we began our own. So you are updating the strings files? =20 (/usr/local/share/opengroupware.org-1.1/translations/French.lproj) > Should I use svn to update the package ? (I don=E2=80=99t know how to us i= t, > perhaps you have some docs ?). You can't commit without permissions; commits have to go through a =20 commiter, usually off a bugzilla issue. But svn is the easiest way to =20 make patches for uploading to bugzilla. > Can I post tarball to bugzilla as > enhancement too ? (it=E2=80=99s only the gebinning I will post it when som= e > parts will be completed) You shouldn't post to bugzilla (an enhancement) until you have =20 something reasonably complete. But possibly translation fixes/improvements can be handled in an =20 incremental fashion. > Note that our translation and theme are build for the actually trunck > packages. From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 5 16:47:02 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Sandy Lelarge) Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:47:02 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] We have build new theme for ogo 1.1 Message-ID: <46DECF76.9060609@cg51.fr> Take a look at http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/lelarges/New_Theme_for_ogo_1.1/view?searchterm=theme Bytheway I just saw that our theme only works in french. We have to work on it. But you can see screenshots and have tarball (for french) ****************************************************************************************************************************** Ce message ou ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles a l'intention exclusive de son destinataire et est couvert par le secret professionnel. Toute utilisation, divulgation ou reproduction de son contenu sont strictement interdits. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, merci de le notifier a son expediteur et d'en detruire toute copie. Le present message pouvant-etre altere a notre insu, le conseil général de la Marne ne peut pas etre engage par son contenu. ****************************************************************************************************************************** From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 5 17:17:02 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Olivier Hallot) Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:17:02 -0300 Subject: [OGo-Users] We have build new theme for ogo 1.1 In-Reply-To: <46DECF76.9060609@cg51.fr> References: <46DECF76.9060609@cg51.fr> Message-ID: <46DED67E.7090809@scinergy.com.br> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060704040102060706060901 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Wow! what a job! Very nice facelift to the project. I hope this work will go to the trunk, or at leat as a trunk package. You say it only works in french. Is that because the icons are french-hardcoded? Congrats indeed! Olivier Sandy Lelarge escreveu: > Take a look at > http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/lelarges/New_Theme_for_ogo_1.1/view?searchterm=theme > > Bytheway I just saw that our theme only works in french. We have to work > on it. > But you can see screenshots and have tarball (for french) > > > > ****************************************************************************************************************************** > Ce message ou ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles > a l'intention exclusive de son destinataire et est couvert par le secret professionnel. > Toute utilisation, divulgation ou reproduction de son contenu sont strictement interdits. > Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, merci de le notifier a son expediteur et d'en detruire toute copie. > Le present message pouvant-etre altere a notre insu, le conseil général de la Marne ne peut pas etre engage par son contenu. > ****************************************************************************************************************************** -- Olivier Hallot Scinergy Consulting Tel (021) 2224-3224, (021) 8822-8812 Rio de Janeiro, Brasil http://www.scinergy.com.br --------------060704040102060706060901 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=utf-8; name="ohallot.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ohallot.vcf" begin:vcard fn:Olivier Hallot n:Hallot;Olivier org:Scinergy Consulting Ltda adr:SL. 1102;;Av. Rio BRanco 124;Rio de Janeiro;RJ;20040-001;Brasil email;internet:ohallot@scinergy.com.br title:Diretor tel;work:+55-21-2224-3224 tel;fax:+55-21-2224-3224 url:http://www.scinergy.com.br version:2.1 end:vcard --------------060704040102060706060901-- From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 5 17:54:01 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:54:01 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] We have build new theme for ogo 1.1 In-Reply-To: <46DED67E.7090809@scinergy.com.br> References: <46DECF76.9060609@cg51.fr> <46DED67E.7090809@scinergy.com.br> Message-ID: <1189011241.4840.0.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> > Wow! what a job! > Very nice facelift to the project. Agree, very nice. From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 5 22:23:16 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Helge Hess) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 23:23:16 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] contribute with theme and translation In-Reply-To: <20070905093535.24vd50f4so4kgwo4@tyr.morrison.iserv.net> References: <46DD45B2.8020003@cg51.fr> <1188908004.4929.6.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> <46DE560C.1090400@cg51.fr> <20070905093535.24vd50f4so4kgwo4@tyr.morrison.iserv.net> Message-ID: <4E0646ED-9816-4BF2-98F1-FCAB0EAC468E@opengroupware.org> On 05.09.2007, at 15:35, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> Ok, I just wonder if we can cause I thought we can=92t use skyrix=92s = =20 >> theme for base. Actually I'm not sure what Sandy means by "skyrix theme", the orange =20 theme? (there is no "skyrix theme"). Helge --=20 Helge Hess http://www.helgehess.eu/ From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 5 22:25:05 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Helge Hess) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 23:25:05 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] We have build new theme for ogo 1.1 In-Reply-To: <46DED67E.7090809@scinergy.com.br> References: <46DECF76.9060609@cg51.fr> <46DED67E.7090809@scinergy.com.br> Message-ID: On 05.09.2007, at 18:17, Olivier Hallot wrote: > I hope this work will go to the trunk, or at leat as a trunk package. Hm, looking at some of the icons, is all of that GPL or LGPL? Thanks, Helge From users@opengroupware.org Thu Sep 6 09:28:06 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Sandy Lelarge) Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:28:06 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] We have build new theme for ogo 1.1 In-Reply-To: References: <46DECF76.9060609@cg51.fr> <46DED67E.7090809@scinergy.com.br> Message-ID: <46DFBA16.4010601@cg51.fr> Thanks to all of you. No it's not hardcoded but we made mistake in folder hierarchy. We have to work on it. And I think tarball are not correct too (missing image I think). I will try to correct this next week. I don't know for now but I think That themes will be GPL or LGPL. Helge Hess a écrit : > On 05.09.2007, at 18:17, Olivier Hallot wrote: >> I hope this work will go to the trunk, or at leat as a trunk package. > > Hm, looking at some of the icons, is all of that GPL or LGPL? > > Thanks, > Helge > > ****************************************************************************************************************************** Ce message ou ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles a l'intention exclusive de son destinataire et est couvert par le secret professionnel. Toute utilisation, divulgation ou reproduction de son contenu sont strictement interdits. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, merci de le notifier a son expediteur et d'en detruire toute copie. Le present message pouvant-etre altere a notre insu, le conseil général de la Marne ne peut pas etre engage par son contenu. ****************************************************************************************************************************** From users@opengroupware.org Thu Sep 6 11:47:21 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 06:47:21 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] We have build new theme for ogo 1.1 In-Reply-To: <46DFBA16.4010601@cg51.fr> References: <46DECF76.9060609@cg51.fr> <46DED67E.7090809@scinergy.com.br> <46DFBA16.4010601@cg51.fr> Message-ID: <1189075641.4752.1.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> . > No it's not hardcoded but we made mistake in folder hierarchy. We have > to work on it. > And I think tarball are not correct too (missing image I think). > I will try to correct this next week. > I don't know for now but I think That themes will be GPL or LGPL. I think Helge's question is where-did-the-icons-come-from? Images & icons are covered by license & copyrights just like code; the icons used in a GPL/GPL'd project have to be equally unencumbered. > >> I hope this work will go to the trunk, or at leat as a trunk package. > > Hm, looking at some of the icons, is all of that GPL or LGPL? From users@opengroupware.org Thu Sep 6 12:04:27 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Sandy Lelarge) Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:04:27 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] We have build new theme for ogo 1.1 In-Reply-To: <1189075641.4752.1.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> References: <46DECF76.9060609@cg51.fr> <46DED67E.7090809@scinergy.com.br> <46DFBA16.4010601@cg51.fr> <1189075641.4752.1.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> Message-ID: <46DFDEBB.4040107@cg51.fr> Thanks for your precision. I didn't anderstood like this. Well, I mean everything is made by our own. But I will ask designer for that. I'm not sure of all part of all images espacially for the robot theme. (logo on TV is our) you will have an answer next week. Adam Tauno Williams a écrit : > . > >> No it's not hardcoded but we made mistake in folder hierarchy. We have >> to work on it. >> And I think tarball are not correct too (missing image I think). >> I will try to correct this next week. >> I don't know for now but I think That themes will be GPL or LGPL. >> > > I think Helge's question is where-did-the-icons-come-from? Images & > icons are covered by license & copyrights just like code; the icons > used in a GPL/GPL'd project have to be equally unencumbered. > > >>>> I hope this work will go to the trunk, or at leat as a trunk package. >>>> >>> Hm, looking at some of the icons, is all of that GPL or LGPL? >>> > > > ****************************************************************************************************************************** Ce message ou ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles a l'intention exclusive de son destinataire et est couvert par le secret professionnel. Toute utilisation, divulgation ou reproduction de son contenu sont strictement interdits. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, merci de le notifier a son expediteur et d'en detruire toute copie. Le present message pouvant-etre altere a notre insu, le conseil général de la Marne ne peut pas etre engage par son contenu. ****************************************************************************************************************************** From users@opengroupware.org Fri Sep 7 20:16:01 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:16:01 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] Consonance r432 Message-ID: <1189192562.4942.5.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> --=-SYTwXhKlBdJ8lN0vzFcg Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have uploaded a new snapshot of Consonance, a Gtk# client for OpenGroupware, that I've been working on forever. This is the first announcement of Consonance on a non-development oriented list.=20 For those who have looked at previous snapshots this one is dramatically faster and more stable. The cache is now maintained via a memory adapter and local searches are performed using db4o SODA queries; caches of more than 8,000 objects still perform very well. If you are interested and can meet the requirements (listed below), download the zip, unpack it in an empty directory to which have write access as a normal user, and then run "Whitemice.Consonance.exe". Then we'll see how quickly it dies. :) Understand that this is just a development snapshot, not a release. =20 Please report bugs to http://code.google.com/p/consonance/issues/list or to me [awilliam@whitemice.org]. Of course: Standard Disclaimer - this is a development snapshot, you edit real data at your own risk. What currently works: * Contacts & Enterprises - Creation - Basic editing (attributes, addresses, phone numbers) - Searching, including query-by-example - Deletion - Assignment & unassignment + Adding and removing contacts from an enterprise. + Adding and removing enterprises from a contact. * Task list loads task as they are recevied from the server - Task actions can be performed - ToDo and Delegated lists can be dynamically filtered by keyword or task state. - Archive list can be dynamically filtered by keyword.=20 - Upcoming tasks are displayed in blue, overdue tasks in red. Requires:=20 * Mono 1.2.5 or greater * Gtk# 2.10.x or greater * zOGI r601 or zOGI included in current nightlies. * CookComputing's Xml-Rpc, Db4o & log4net - These DLLs are included in the ZIP file. * I doubt this version will run on Microsoft Windows, I haven't=20 even tried. Screenshot: http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/whitemice/consonance/ConsonanceScreen= shotContacts/image_view http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/whitemice/consonance/ConsonanceTaskWi= ndow/image_view Consonance Home: http://code.google.com/p/consonance/ Consonance Download: http://code.google.com/p/consonance/downloads/list zOGI Home: http://code.google.com/p/zogi/ zOGI Source: http://code.google.com/p/zogi/source --=20 Consonance: an Open Source .NET OpenGroupware client. http://code.google.com/p/consonance/ - Searching for a bored Cairo# hacke= r. Contact:awilliam@whitemiceconsulting.com http://www.opengroupware.org --=-SYTwXhKlBdJ8lN0vzFcg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBG4aNxLRePpNle04MRAqGWAJ9HD/AAaOpSUmgHHY2iy3RR4yT/OACfbyd3 NwtKCw2jR1gXZp+aVH28HzM= =spcd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SYTwXhKlBdJ8lN0vzFcg-- From users@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 10 17:48:42 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Chris Picton) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:48:42 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] Installation of sogo from RPMS - ldap authentication Message-ID: <46E5756A.1000208@tangent.co.za> Hi - I sent this to the sogo list, but so far have not have any response I am trying out sogo, using the prebuilt RPMS for centos5 - the inverse1537 branch. The rpms install with no problems. The only necessary configuration appears to be the ~sogo/GNUstep/Defaults/.GNUstepDefaults file I create the file with the following commands: defaults -u sogo write sogod-0.9 OCSFolderInfoURL "postgresql://sogo:sogo@127.0.0.1:5432/sogo/sogo_folder_info" defaults -u sogo write sogod-0.9 AgenorProfileURL "postgresql://sogo:sogo@127.0.0.1:5432/sogo/sogo_user_profile" defaults -u sogo write sogod-0.9 SOGoDefaultMailDomain "tangent.co.za" defaults -u sogo write sogod-0.9 SOGoFallbackIMAP4Server "192.168.20.4" defaults -u sogo write sogod-0.9 SOGoAuthentificationMethod "bypass" defaults -u sogo write sogod-0.9 SOGoSuperUsername chrisp defaults -u sogo write sogod-0.9 SOGoServerTimeZone Africa/Johannesburg When running defaults, I get the following errors: ---------------- 2007-09-07 09:56:45.166 defaults[4064] GNUSTEP_CONFIG_FILE value ('') is not an absolute path. Please rebuild GNUstep-base specifying a valid path to the config file. 2007-09-07 09:56:45.173 defaults[4064] Unknown time zone name `SAST'. 2007-09-07 09:56:45.174 defaults[4064] Using time zone with absolute offset 0. 2007-09-07 09:56:45.165 defaults[4064] GNUSTEP_CONFIG_FILE value ('') is not an absolute path. Please rebuild GNUstep-base specifying a valid path to the config file. 2007-09-07 09:56:45.186 defaults[4064] GNUSTEP_CONFIG_FILE value ('') is not an absolute path. Please rebuild GNUstep-base specifying a valid path to the config file. ------------------ I can however log into the server and create calendar and address book entries Accessing mail gives me an apache 'Internal Server Error', with the following in the logs EXCEPTION: NAME:NSInvalidArgumentException REASON:Tried to add nil value for key 'email' to dictionary INFO:{fullName = chrisp; } ### child 4179 (#1) was terminated by signal 6 (uptime=30s). [Fri Sep 07 12:01:24 2007] [error] error during reading of response line .. I assume that is because I am actually bypassing authentication. Now, I want to configure LDAP auth. defaults -u sogo write sogod-0.9 SOGoAuthentificationMethod LDAP The snippet to put into the .GNUstepDefaults is: SOGoLDAPSources = { CNFieldName = cn; IDFieldName = uid; UIDFieldName = uid; baseDN = "ou=Users,o=testing"; bindDN = "cn=Administrator,o=testing"; bindPassword = "mypass!"; canAuthenticate = YES; hostname = "192.168.20.4"; id = "ldap-mycompany"; port = 389; }; Where does this go: If I try the following: ------------------------------------ { NSGlobalDomain = { }; "sogod-0.9" = { AgenorProfileURL = "postgresql://sogo:sogo@127.0.0.1:5432/sogo/sogo_user_profile"; OCSFolderInfoURL = "postgresql://sogo:sogo@127.0.0.1:5432/sogo/sogo_folder_info"; SOGoAuthentificationMethod = LDAP; SOGoDefaultMailDomain = tangent.co.za; SOGoFallbackIMAP4Server = 192.168.20.4; SOGoServerTimeZone = Africa/Johannesburg; SOGoSuperUsername = chrisp; SOGoLDAPSources = { { CNFieldName = cn; IDFieldName = uid; UIDFieldName = uid; baseDN = "ou=Users,o=testing"; bindDN = "cn=Administrator,o=testing"; bindPassword = "MyPass!"; canAuthenticate = YES; hostname = "192.168.20.4"; id = "ldap-mycompany"; port = 389; }; }; }; } ------------------------------------------------------- I then get the following in my logs when trying to authenticate: Sep 07 10:12:45 sogod-0.9 [4301]: <0x0x9b5caf8[SOGoWebAuthenticator]> tried wrong password for user 'chrisp'! 2007-09-07 10:12:45.180 sogod-0.9[4286] WARNING(-[SaxXMLReaderFactory _loadBundlePath:infoDictionary:nameMap:typeMap:]): multiple parsers available for MIME type 'text/calendar', using 'VSCardSaxDriver' as default for type text/calendar. 2007-09-07 10:12:45.180 sogod-0.9[4286] WARNING(-[SaxXMLReaderFactory _loadBundlePath:infoDictionary:nameMap:typeMap:]): multiple parsers available for MIME type 'text/x-vcard', using 'VSCardSaxDriver' as default for type text/x-vcard. 2007-09-07 10:12:45.203 sogod-0.9[4286] WARNING: called -[WEStringTableManager _cachedStringForKey:inTableNamed:withDefaultValue:languages:] without languages array (nil) ! Sep 07 10:12:45 sogod-0.9 [4301]: <0x0x9b48428[WEStringTableManager]> missing translations directory ... Sep 07 10:12:45 sogod-0.9 [4301]: <0x0x9b48428[WEStringTableManager]> missing translations directory ... 2007-09-07 10:12:45.205 sogod-0.9[4286] WARNING: called -[WEStringTableManager _cachedStringForKey:inTableNamed:withDefaultValue:languages:] without languages array (nil) ! Sep 07 10:12:45 sogod-0.9 [4301]: <0x0x9b48428[WEStringTableManager]> missing translations directory ... Sep 07 10:12:45 sogod-0.9 [4301]: <0x0x9b48428[WEStringTableManager]> missing translations directory ... 2007-09-07 10:12:45.206 sogod-0.9[4286] WARNING: called -[WEStringTableManager _cachedStringForKey:inTableNamed:withDefaultValue:languages:] without languages array (nil) ! Sep 07 10:12:45 sogod-0.9 [4301]: <0x0x9b48428[WEStringTableManager]> missing translations directory ... Sep 07 10:12:45 sogod-0.9 [4301]: <0x0x9b48428[WEStringTableManager]> missing translations directory ... 2007-09-07 10:12:45.209 sogod-0.9[4286] WARNING: called -[WEStringTableManager _cachedStringForKey:inTableNamed:withDefaultValue:languages:] without languages array (nil) ! Sep 07 10:12:45 sogod-0.9 [4301]: <0x0x9b48428[WEStringTableManager]> missing translations directory ... Sep 07 10:12:45 sogod-0.9 [4301]: <0x0x9b48428[WEStringTableManager]> missing translations directory ... 2007-09-07 10:12:45.211 sogod-0.9[4286] WARNING: called -[WEStringTableManager _cachedStringForKey:inTableNamed:withDefaultValue:languages:] without languages array (nil) ! Sep 07 10:12:45 sogod-0.9 [4301]: <0x0x9b48428[WEStringTableManager]> missing translations directory ... Sep 07 10:12:45 sogod-0.9 [4301]: <0x0x9b48428[WEStringTableManager]> missing translations directory ... 192.168.20.122 - - [07/Sep/2007:10:12:45 GMT] "POST /SOGo.woa/so/view HTTP/1.1" 200 859/59 0.042 3028 71% 1M ------------- When I stop sogo, I get then following: Session terminated, killing shell...^[[A2007-09-07 10:13:07.243 sogod-0.9[4286] File NSDictionary.m: 594. In [GSMutableDictionary -initWithContentsOfFile:] Contents of file '/home/sogo/GNUstep/Defaults/.GNUstepDefaults' does not contain a dictionary ...killed. and my file then contains: { NSGlobalDomain = { }; "sogod-0.9" = { }; } Can someone please give me some info on how to get ldap authentication working. Thanks Chris From users@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 10 22:44:56 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Lorenzo Milesi) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:44:56 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] Error on projects Message-ID: <29c147bd0709101444m283924cdw5d1cee27e3dcc85e@mail.gmail.com> Hi I'm trying to open an existing project and ogo gives me the following error: Sep 10 21:16:11 ogo-webui-1.1 [4314]: [ERROR] <0x0x851b61c[OGoFileManagerFactory]> -[OGoFileManagerFactory fileManagerInContext:forProject:] found no filemanager class for scheme file: <_NSAbsoluteFileURL 0x08d12ecc: 'file:///var/lib/opengroupware.org/skyfs/38100'> Sep 10 21:16:11 ogo-webui-1.1 [4314]: SkyProject4Viewer couldn't create filemanager for gid <0x0x8d02b64[EOKeyGlobalID]: Project 38091> Sep 10 21:16:11 ogo-webui-1.1 [4314]: [WARN] (10DA10DA0146E5B2D1) Could not execute command view for types ( ) it happens also on a newly created project :( it's a fresh reinstall from a backup. most of the other projects are working correctly. What could it be? thanks maxxer From users@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 11 03:32:18 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:32:18 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] Error on projects In-Reply-To: <29c147bd0709101444m283924cdw5d1cee27e3dcc85e@mail.gmail.com> References: <29c147bd0709101444m283924cdw5d1cee27e3dcc85e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1189477938.11091.5.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> > I'm trying to open an existing project and ogo gives me the following error: > Sep 10 21:16:11 ogo-webui-1.1 [4314]: [ERROR] > <0x0x851b61c[OGoFileManagerFactory]> -[OGoFileManagerFactory > fileManagerInContext:forProject:] found no filemanager class for > scheme file: <_NSAbsoluteFileURL 0x08d12ecc: > 'file:///var/lib/opengroupware.org/skyfs/38100'> > Sep 10 21:16:11 ogo-webui-1.1 [4314]: SkyProject4Viewer couldn't > create filemanager for gid <0x0x8d02b64[EOKeyGlobalID]: Project 38091> > Sep 10 21:16:11 ogo-webui-1.1 [4314]: [WARN] (10DA10DA0146E5B2D1) > Could not execute command view for types ( > > ) > it happens also on a newly created project :( > it's a fresh reinstall from a backup. most of the other projects are > working correctly. > What could it be? Is the ogo-docapi-fs or your distributions equivalent installed? That is my first guess given the error message. Otherwise is the SkyFSPath default defined to the same path as previously? Does OGo have permissions for this path? Does the url attribute of the project point to the projects current root (after the restore)? The url of an FS project is absolute and persists in the url attribute so if you restructure the server you must modify the url of FS projects. The root of DB projects is always the document root. From users@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 11 09:02:47 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Lorenzo Milesi) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:02:47 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] Error on projects In-Reply-To: <1189477938.11091.5.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> References: <29c147bd0709101444m283924cdw5d1cee27e3dcc85e@mail.gmail.com> <1189477938.11091.5.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> Message-ID: <29c147bd0709110102l1f962235s871d5f5e99a8fe18@mail.gmail.com> On 9/11/07, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Hi Thanks for your reply! > Is the ogo-docapi-fs or your distributions equivalent installed? That > is my first guess given the error message. I've installed on debian using the trunk repository deb http://download.opengroupware.org/nightly/packages/debian etch trunk and libopengroupware.org-docapi5.3 is installed. > Otherwise is the SkyFSPath default defined to the same path as > previously? Does OGo have permissions for this path? Does the url > attribute of the project point to the projects current root (after the > restore)? The strange is that even newly created projects are in error! But some of the old work fine! The path is /var/lib/opengroupware.org/skyfs and it has ogo:ogo rwxr-x permissions, so it should be fine. Thanks! maxxer From users@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 11 12:51:15 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 07:51:15 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] Error on projects In-Reply-To: <29c147bd0709110102l1f962235s871d5f5e99a8fe18@mail.gmail.com> References: <29c147bd0709101444m283924cdw5d1cee27e3dcc85e@mail.gmail.com> <1189477938.11091.5.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> <29c147bd0709110102l1f962235s871d5f5e99a8fe18@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1189511475.11091.10.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> > > Is the ogo-docapi-fs or your distributions equivalent installed? That > > is my first guess given the error message. > I've installed on debian using the trunk repository > deb http://download.opengroupware.org/nightly/packages/debian etch trunk > and libopengroupware.org-docapi5.3 is installed. That isn't the relevant package; you should have a docapi-fs for supporting filesystem projects and docapi-db for db projects. That Debian only installs on or the other is something I've seen before. Specifically install the fs package. You shouldn't depend so much on package repositories. If you use a package/application you should keep a local copy of all the packages installed. Otherwise your backup strategy is incomplete. > > Otherwise is the SkyFSPath default defined to the same path as > > previously? Does OGo have permissions for this path? Does the url > > attribute of the project point to the projects current root (after the > > restore)? > The strange is that even newly created projects are in error! But some > of the old work fine! > The path is /var/lib/opengroupware.org/skyfs and it has ogo:ogo rwxr-x > permissions, so it should be fine. From users@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 11 15:52:14 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (lelarges) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:52:14 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] We have build new theme for ogo 1.1 In-Reply-To: <1189075641.4752.1.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> References: <46DECF76.9060609@cg51.fr> <46DED67E.7090809@scinergy.com.br> <46DFBA16.4010601@cg51.fr> <1189075641.4752.1.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> Message-ID: <46E6AB9E.2000505@cg51.fr> Here is what designer tells me : Icons comes from : http://www.iconarchive.com/index.php http://www.icone-gif.com/ and images from : http://www.photo-libre.fr/ => we have to put link when we use images, we will do. http://www.freemages.fr/ Do you it will be ok ? Adam Tauno Williams a écrit : > . > >> No it's not hardcoded but we made mistake in folder hierarchy. We have >> to work on it. >> And I think tarball are not correct too (missing image I think). >> I will try to correct this next week. >> I don't know for now but I think That themes will be GPL or LGPL. >> > > I think Helge's question is where-did-the-icons-come-from? Images & > icons are covered by license & copyrights just like code; the icons > used in a GPL/GPL'd project have to be equally unencumbered. > > >>>> I hope this work will go to the trunk, or at leat as a trunk package. >>>> >>> Hm, looking at some of the icons, is all of that GPL or LGPL? >>> > > > ****************************************************************************************************************************** Ce message ou ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles a l'intention exclusive de son destinataire et est couvert par le secret professionnel. Toute utilisation, divulgation ou reproduction de son contenu sont strictement interdits. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, merci de le notifier a son expediteur et d'en detruire toute copie. Le present message pouvant-etre altere a notre insu, le conseil général de la Marne ne peut pas etre engage par son contenu. ****************************************************************************************************************************** From users@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 11 22:54:22 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:54:22 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] We have build new theme for ogo 1.1 In-Reply-To: <46E6AB9E.2000505@cg51.fr> References: <46DECF76.9060609@cg51.fr> <46DED67E.7090809@scinergy.com.br> <46DFBA16.4010601@cg51.fr> <1189075641.4752.1.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> <46E6AB9E.2000505@cg51.fr> Message-ID: <1189547662.5140.3.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 16:52 +0200, lelarges wrote: > Here is what designer tells me : > > Icons comes from : > > http://www.iconarchive.com/index.php You need to contact the owner of the specific icons you are using. From the website: "If you want to use icons commercially, you'll have to pay the author of the icons or arrange a special arangement with the author." This is incompatible with the GPL. > http://www.icone-gif.com/ The license for this site is here - http://www.freemages.fr/help/licence_art_libre.php - but my French is way too rusty. These http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/silk/ and these http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Crystal_Clear are Ok. > and images from : > http://www.photo-libre.fr/ => we have to put link when we use > images, we will do. > http://www.freemages.fr/ > Do you it will be ok ? > Adam Tauno Williams a écrit : > > . From users@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 11 23:59:09 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (chris h) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:59:09 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] We have build new theme for ogo 1.1 In-Reply-To: <1189547662.5140.3.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> References: <46DECF76.9060609@cg51.fr> <46E6AB9E.2000505@cg51.fr> <1189547662.5140.3.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> Message-ID: <200709111859.09971.chris123@magma.ca> On Tuesday 11 September 2007 17:54:22 Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 16:52 +0200, lelarges wrote: > > Here is what designer tells me : > > > > Icons comes from : > > > > http://www.iconarchive.com/index.php > > You need to contact the owner of the specific icons you are using. From > the website: "If you want to use icons commercially, you'll have to pay > the author of the icons or arrange a special arangement with the > author." This is incompatible with the GPL. Actually Im going to have to disagree with this statement. GPL does not speak to costs, rather to access to code. We had a very similar arrangements on our product line when I worked for Corel Computer which seems a very long time ago now. As long as the authors do not put restrictions on commercial redistribution then its perfectly legitimate I would argue. However, its all in the contract you sign and neither of us have seen any paperwork other then the statements above. Best regards /ch From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 12 13:24:26 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:24:26 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] We have build new theme for ogo 1.1 In-Reply-To: <200709111859.09971.chris123@magma.ca> References: <46DECF76.9060609@cg51.fr> <46E6AB9E.2000505@cg51.fr> <1189547662.5140.3.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> <200709111859.09971.chris123@magma.ca> Message-ID: <1189599866.5381.9.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> --=-6sdScGnl/u4cpghjezsd Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 18:59 -0400, chris h wrote: > On Tuesday 11 September 2007 17:54:22 Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 16:52 +0200, lelarges wrote: > > > Here is what designer tells me : > > > Icons comes from : > > > http://www.iconarchive.com/index.ph > > You need to contact the owner of the specific icons you are using. Fro= m > > the website: "If you want to use icons commercially, you'll have to pay > > the author of the icons or arrange a special arangement with the > > author." This is incompatible with the GPL. > Actually Im going to have to disagree with this statement. GPL does not s= peak=20 > to costs, rather to access to code. > We had a very similar arrangements on our=20 > product line when I worked for Corel Computer which seems a very long tim= e=20 > ago now. As long as the authors do not put restrictions on commercial=20 > redistribution then its perfectly legitimate I would argue.=20 I'd take "If you want to use icons commercially" as placing limits on "commercial redistribution". > However, its all=20 > in the contract you sign and neither of us have seen any paperwork other = then=20 > the statements above. iconarchive leaves the licensing up to the creator of the icon, so it is possible they are fine with something like creative-commons, but they have to be contacted [if possible]. My advice is always to stick to archives that are more explicit about their licensing. --=-6sdScGnl/u4cpghjezsd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBG59p6LRePpNle04MRAjzFAJ9akT+Y/Cwsnz53JdEpHl3Du6wc9QCfdWeK CxopAOE6DIeC0BvT0Mc3pi4= =LZz2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6sdScGnl/u4cpghjezsd-- From users@opengroupware.org Thu Sep 13 20:05:54 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Peter Duda) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:05:54 -0700 Subject: [OGo-Users] Default Write Access Message-ID: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0028_01C7F5FE.6F63AC90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Is there any way to change the Default Write Access on a group? Or will it always be that group that has write access? For instance, If I had Group A that I wanted to have write access to Groups B and C. If I gave Group A default write access in all of the individuals in both groups B and C does that work? Their private appointments would still be private because the read access is private right? Is there another way of doing this? Peter ------=_NextPart_000_0028_01C7F5FE.6F63AC90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Is there any way to change the Default Write Access = on a group? Or will it always be that group that has write = access?

For instance, If I had Group A that I wanted to have = write access to Groups B and C.

If I gave Group A default write access in all of the individuals in both groups B and C does that work?  Their private appointments would still be private because the read access is private = right?

Is there another way of doing = this?

 

Peter

 

------=_NextPart_000_0028_01C7F5FE.6F63AC90-- From users@opengroupware.org Thu Sep 13 20:12:19 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:12:19 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] Default Write Access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20070913151219.b9bqozvngg8o0s0s@tyr.morrison.iserv.net> > Is there any way to change the Default Write Access on a group? Or will it > always be that group that has write access? I don't follow what you mean; only the administrative account and members of team_creators can modify teams. > If I gave Group A default write access in all of the individuals in both > groups B and C does that work? Their private appointments would still be > private because the read access is private right? > Is there another way of doing this? I'm not following what you are trying to accomplish. From users@opengroupware.org Thu Sep 13 20:21:54 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Peter Duda) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:21:54 -0700 Subject: [OGo-Users] Default Write Access In-Reply-To: <20070913151219.b9bqozvngg8o0s0s@tyr.morrison.iserv.net> Message-ID: Sorry I am talking about write access on appointments. Can I give write access to appointments created in group folders to other members of another group? One of the ideas is to have a group that "oversees" appointments of other groups - especially the public folder Peter -----Original Message----- From: users-admin@opengroupware.org [mailto:users-admin@opengroupware.org] On Behalf Of Adam Tauno Williams Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 12:12 PM To: users@opengroupware.org Subject: Re: [OGo-Users] Default Write Access > Is there any way to change the Default Write Access on a group? Or will it > always be that group that has write access? I don't follow what you mean; only the administrative account and members of team_creators can modify teams. > If I gave Group A default write access in all of the individuals in both > groups B and C does that work? Their private appointments would still be > private because the read access is private right? > Is there another way of doing this? I'm not following what you are trying to accomplish. -- OpenGroupware.org Users users@opengroupware.org http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/users From users@opengroupware.org Thu Sep 13 20:40:56 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:40:56 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] Default Write Access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1189712456.5522.19.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> --=-Fi+2BA3wu/mXaKw9fCi8 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I am talking about write access on appointments. Can I give write access = to > appointments created in group folders=20 Ah, so you are creating the appointments via GroupDAV/CalDAV (hence the mention of folders)? > to other members of another group? In recent versions of ZideStore the user's default write permissions apply to appointments unless they are created in a specific group's folder (then I think the write permissions are always specific to that group). I'm not aware of anyway to setup 'additive groups' when creating appointments via ZideStore. > One of the ideas is to have a group that "oversees" appointments of other > groups - especially the public folder I wonder if that isn't more of a non-participant participant use-case than it is a permissions use case (as participants can always see appointments they are participating in). Perhaps adding the oversight team as a non-participant and enabling overview folders would be a solution? --=-Fi+2BA3wu/mXaKw9fCi8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBG6ZJILRePpNle04MRAhqIAJwPb+DIFIEd8DrntMFn4v83QhGLyACfZrUN 9exYXmrRRlgQcLuzsetxd1c= =3P9t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Fi+2BA3wu/mXaKw9fCi8-- From users@opengroupware.org Thu Sep 13 20:51:16 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Sebastian Reitenbach) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:51:16 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] Default Write Access Message-ID: <20070913195116.D22E63C8BB@l00-bugdead-prods.de> Hi, users@opengroupware.org wrote: > Sorry > I am talking about write access on appointments. Can I give write access to > appointments created in group folders to other members of another group? > One of the ideas is to have a group that "oversees" appointments of other > groups - especially the public folder take a look at the scheduler preferences. I think the write access is what you are looking for. kind regards Sebastian. From users@opengroupware.org Thu Sep 13 22:22:01 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Peter Duda) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:22:01 -0700 Subject: [OGo-Users] Default Write Access In-Reply-To: <1189712456.5522.19.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> Message-ID: >Ah, so you are creating the appointments via GroupDAV/CalDAV (hence the >mention of folders)? Zidelook actually, but ZL 2.1 says it fully supports the default write access of the scheduler (which is why I posted here - I hope that was right) What I did was give the "oversight" team write access in everybody's preferences and it works for me for now. The oversight group can't read private items therefore they can't change them, but in the public folder (all-internet) they always have write authority, and if they are a member of a group they have write authority there as well. What would be nice ;-) and what I was originally trying to ask is if teams as well as individuals had configurable default write and read access in the scheduler. That way an oversight group could view and or change another teams appointments without having to be a member of that team and have it show up in personal calendars whenever the team was a participant. (which it sounds like isn't possible) Maybe I will post this idea in the discuss thread if it hasn't been talked about already Thanks for the help Peter -----Original Message----- From: users-admin@opengroupware.org [mailto:users-admin@opengroupware.org] On Behalf Of Adam Tauno Williams Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 12:41 PM To: users@opengroupware.org Subject: RE: [OGo-Users] Default Write Access > I am talking about write access on appointments. Can I give write access to > appointments created in group folders Ah, so you are creating the appointments via GroupDAV/CalDAV (hence the mention of folders)? > to other members of another group? In recent versions of ZideStore the user's default write permissions apply to appointments unless they are created in a specific group's folder (then I think the write permissions are always specific to that group). I'm not aware of anyway to setup 'additive groups' when creating appointments via ZideStore. > One of the ideas is to have a group that "oversees" appointments of other > groups - especially the public folder I wonder if that isn't more of a non-participant participant use-case than it is a permissions use case (as participants can always see appointments they are participating in). Perhaps adding the oversight team as a non-participant and enabling overview folders would be a solution? From users@opengroupware.org Fri Sep 14 03:02:16 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Mark Pavlichuk) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:02:16 +1000 Subject: [OGo-Users] Categories/ACLs Message-ID: <46E9EBA8.1000408@internode.on.net> If I try to "*Change Categories of List Entries" in the* Categories/ACLs option under either "Contacts" or "Companies" I get an error... specifically a popup that says: Opengroupware.org: Affected:0 Failed: 0 Though the numbers change depending on the users or companies I have listed. Any pointers as to what's going on here? -Mark From users@opengroupware.org Fri Sep 14 10:58:52 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:58:52 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] Categories/ACLs In-Reply-To: <46E9EBA8.1000408@internode.on.net> References: <46E9EBA8.1000408@internode.on.net> Message-ID: <1189763932.15259.1.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> > If I try to "*Change Categories of List Entries" in the* > Categories/ACLs option under either "Contacts" or "Companies" I get an > error... specifically a popup that says: > Opengroupware.org: > Affected:0 > Failed: 0 > Though the numbers change depending on the users or companies I have > listed. > Any pointers as to what's going on here? I think it simply indicates what the server accomplished. If I add a category to 100 companies I get - Affected: 100 Failed: 0 From users@opengroupware.org Sat Sep 15 02:00:20 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Mark Pavlichuk) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:00:20 +1000 Subject: [OGo-Users] Categories/ACLs Message-ID: <46EB2EA4.5060100@internode.on.net> > I think it simply indicates what the server accomplished. If I add a > category to 100 companies I get - > > Affected: 100 > Failed: 0 I always get a "Failed: 1" if the number of "Affected" records is greater than 0. If I click on "add" this message comes up straight away and I can't actually enter any category information which presumably isn't the expected behavior(?) -Mark From users@opengroupware.org Sat Sep 15 02:12:30 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:12:30 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] Categories/ACLs In-Reply-To: <46EB2EA4.5060100@internode.on.net> References: <46EB2EA4.5060100@internode.on.net> Message-ID: <6354-SnapperMsg05076A73C310E206@[75.219.203.49]> >> I think it simply indicates what the server accomplished. If I add a >> category to 100 companies I get - >> Affected: 100 >> Failed: 0 > I always get a "Failed: 1" if the number of "Affected" records is greater than 0. If I click on "add" this >message comes up straight away and I can't actually enter any category information which presumably isn't the >expected behavior(?) Perhaps your search has returned one company to which you only have read access? Do you see any messages in the webui err log? "If I click on "add" thismessage comes up straight away and I can't actually enter any" doesn't make sense. You select the categories to use before you click add/apply/.... From users@opengroupware.org Sun Sep 16 14:45:26 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Gregory Malsack) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 08:45:26 -0500 Subject: [OGo-Users] Additional ApptType Buttons Message-ID: Hello All, Can anyone direct me to a document that explains how to add additional appointment type buttons on the appointment viewer screen? Thanks, Gregory Malsack From users@opengroupware.org Sun Sep 16 15:05:35 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Gregory Malsack) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 09:05:35 -0500 Subject: [OGo-Users] Additional ApptType Buttons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <47DA5E88-C255-407D-9AD0-3492DCF0714D@gmellc.com> Never mind everyone. I found it at http://www.opengroupware.org/en/users/faq/index.html It's always the first place you look after you ask for help... /: ) Thanks Anyways, Greg On Sep 16, 2007, at 8:45 AM, Gregory Malsack wrote: > Hello All, > > Can anyone direct me to a document that explains how to add > additional appointment type buttons on the appointment viewer screen? > > Thanks, > Gregory Malsack > -- > OpenGroupware.org Users > users@opengroupware.org > http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/users From users@opengroupware.org Sun Sep 16 18:06:59 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (chris h) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:06:59 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] We have build new theme for ogo 1.1 In-Reply-To: <1189599866.5381.9.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> References: <46DECF76.9060609@cg51.fr> <200709111859.09971.chris123@magma.ca> <1189599866.5381.9.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> Message-ID: <200709161306.59441.chris123@magma.ca> On Wednesday 12 September 2007 08:24:26 Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > iconarchive leaves the licensing up to the creator of the icon, so it is > possible they are fine with something like creative-commons, but they > have to be contacted [if possible]. My advice is always to stick to > archives that are more explicit about their licensing. I dont disagree. i was just pointing out that it should not be a show stopper at this point in the program if the icons are desirable for the project. Most things can be worked out to a good end if there is the desire or will or need to do it. -- /ch From users@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 18 13:20:46 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Sebastian Reitenbach) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:20:46 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] opensuse 10.2 x86_64 rpm's Message-ID: <20070918122047.09F253D927@l00-bugdead-prods.de> hi all, are there any ogo 1.1.7 or trunk rpm's available for the distri/hardware mentioned in the subject? If not, I can take the i586 based from adam: http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/whitemice/OGo-openSUSE-TRUNK.tar.gz/download but if there are some x86_64 rpm's available, I would prefer to use these. kind regards Sebastian From users@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 18 15:01:39 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:01:39 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] opensuse 10.2 x86_64 rpm's In-Reply-To: <20070918122047.09F253D927@l00-bugdead-prods.de> References: <20070918122047.09F253D927@l00-bugdead-prods.de> Message-ID: <1190124099.5996.1.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> --=-1EFOtwinVr3e2a+6aeRF Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > are there any ogo 1.1.7 or trunk rpm's available for the distri/hardware=20 > mentioned in the subject?=20 I'm not aware of any. =20 > If not, I can take the i586 based from adam: > http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/whitemice/OGo-openSUSE-TRUNK.tar.gz= /download > but if there are some x86_64 rpm's available, I would prefer to use these= . Of course, a 64-bit OGo, is pretty pointless. OGo doesn't need to allocate large chunks of memory. But you, theoretically, should be able to rebuild the source RPMs with no trouble. --=-1EFOtwinVr3e2a+6aeRF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBG79pDLRePpNle04MRAuV9AJ9kX5KuxT6GgCKkAlioTK7jiRWDtQCfXyWZ ZsEUkNIti9mih9RznJBeNLk= =P40p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-1EFOtwinVr3e2a+6aeRF-- From users@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 18 17:08:53 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Sebastian Reitenbach) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:08:53 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] opensuse 10.2 x86_64 rpm's Message-ID: <20070918160854.21C0B3D9E5@l00-bugdead-prods.de> users@opengroupware.org wrote: > > are there any ogo 1.1.7 or trunk rpm's available for the distri/hardware > > mentioned in the subject? > > I'm not aware of any. > > > If not, I can take the i586 based from adam: > > http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/whitemice/OGo-openSUSE-TRUNK.tar.gz/download > > but if there are some x86_64 rpm's available, I would prefer to use these. > > Of course, a 64-bit OGo, is pretty pointless. OGo doesn't need to > allocate large chunks of memory. But you, theoretically, should be able > to rebuild the source RPMs with no trouble. > I found your documentation in the docs, but I don't have the time right now. maybe later, thank you Sebastian From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 19 20:05:23 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:05:23 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] Conflict Detection (Bug?) Message-ID: <1190228723.5829.19.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> --=-DdnaOO2JEE64/B72MKxS Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have user A who is member of team X. I create an appointment with a participant of X and a role of NON-PARTICIPANT. I create an overlapping appointment with a participant of A and a role of REQ-PARTICIPANT. I see a conflict. Is this a bug? My understanding was that a role of NON-PARTICIPANT would suppress conflict. Oddly the appointment with user "A" does not show any conflict, but if I look at the appointment with the NON-PARTICIPANT team as a participant I see a conflict with the user-A appointment. The same is true if I create an appointment with A:NON-PARTICIPANT and another overlapping appointment with A:REQ-PARTICIPANT. The NON-PARTICIPANT appointment sees a conflict with the REQ-PARTICIPANT appointment but the REQ-PARTICIPANT does not see a conflict with the NON-PARTICIPANT appointment. Shouldn't conflicts always appear from both sides? My understanding of conflicts is from the map: Conflict-Map as implemented in the conflicts command: CHAIR REQ-PART OPT-PART NON-PART NEEDS-ACTION yes yes might no yes yes yes might no yes ACCEPTED yes yes yes no yes DECLINED no no no no no TENTATIVE yes yes yes no yes DELEGATED no no no no no --=-DdnaOO2JEE64/B72MKxS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBG8XLzLRePpNle04MRAh+tAJ9Ky7Ef9VWdJZJPf4ecced9iyGd5gCdGm0a XaKJglSgO29c9G052SVfrrk= =/xtN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-DdnaOO2JEE64/B72MKxS-- From users@opengroupware.org Thu Sep 20 10:45:24 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Rafel Amer Ramon) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:45:24 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] NXConstantString does not recognize cStringLength Message-ID: <46F24134.5060109@ruth.upc.edu> Hi, sorry if this question has been asked before. I have installed OGo-1.1.7, but when I trie to run it, I get the following error: UserInfo: no userinfo [1966]: process 2027 exited with code 1 ### waiting for child 2027 (#59) failed: No child processes Uncatched Objective-C exception: exceptionClass Reason: Objective-C runtime error: error: NXConstantString (instance) NXConstantString does not recognize cStringLength The objective-c library that is installed in my system is libobjc1 that comes with ubuntu, not the libobjc-lf2. Any suggestion? Thanks. R. Amer Thecnical University of Catalonia -- Aquest missatge ha estat analitzat per MailScanner a la cerca de virus i d'altres continguts perillosos, i es considera que està net. For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk From users@opengroupware.org Thu Sep 20 11:32:49 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Helge Hess) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:32:49 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] NXConstantString does not recognize cStringLength In-Reply-To: <46F24134.5060109@ruth.upc.edu> References: <46F24134.5060109@ruth.upc.edu> Message-ID: <41856568-D3E6-4357-A331-7C0BBF9A6053@opengroupware.org> On 20.09.2007, at 11:45, Rafel Amer Ramon wrote: > sorry if this question has been asked before. ?! http://www.google.com/search?q=NXConstantString+does+not+recognize +cStringLength Helge From users@opengroupware.org Sun Sep 23 22:24:27 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Helge Hess) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:24:27 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] Conflict Detection (Bug?) In-Reply-To: <1190228723.5829.19.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> References: <1190228723.5829.19.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> Message-ID: <5524A92D-4A1D-48BC-825B-88896BFEF5ED@opengroupware.org> On 19.09.2007, at 21:05, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > I have user A who is member of team X. > > I create an appointment with a participant of X and a role of > NON-PARTICIPANT. > > I create an overlapping appointment with a participant of A and a role > of REQ-PARTICIPANT. > > I see a conflict. > > Is this a bug? My understanding was that a role of NON-PARTICIPANT > would suppress conflict. Hm. Possibly. Actually I'm not sure whether groups work with those extended status codes. (you usually flatten groups when you want to use the extended stuff because the 'confirm' stuff only makes sense with individual participants, but of course NON-PARTICIPANT seems reasonable). > The same is true if I create an appointment with A:NON-PARTICIPANT and > another overlapping appointment with A:REQ-PARTICIPANT. The > NON-PARTICIPANT appointment sees a conflict with the REQ-PARTICIPANT > appointment but the REQ-PARTICIPANT does not see a conflict with the > NON-PARTICIPANT appointment. > > Shouldn't conflicts always appear from both sides? This is a good question :-) For REQ vs OPT vs NON-PART - probably. But for status values, I'm not sure - eg if a value is tentative it might depend which direction you check. > My understanding of conflicts is from the map: > Conflict-Map as implemented in the conflicts command: > CHAIR REQ-PART OPT-PART NON-PART > NEEDS-ACTION yes yes might no yes > yes yes might no yes > ACCEPTED yes yes yes no yes > DECLINED no no no no no > TENTATIVE yes yes yes no yes > DELEGATED no no no no no Puh. This is 3 year old code :-) The SQL pattern seems to be this one: pattern = @"(%A > %@) AND (%A < %@) " @"AND (%A = 0 OR %A IS NULL) " @"AND (%A = 0 OR %A IS NULL) " @"AND ((%A IN (%@)) AND " // conflict for NEED-INFO CHAIR and REQ-PART events and then for all // ACCEPTED/TENTATIVE events (unless used with a non-part) // args: stat, stat, role, role, role, stat, stat, role // TODO: move to an own qualifier which is static and conjoined? @"(((%A IS NULL OR %A = 'NEEDS-ACTION') AND " @" (%A = 'CHAIR' OR %A = 'REQ-PARTICIPANT' OR %A IS NULL)) " @" OR " @" ((%A = 'ACCEPTED' OR %A = 'TENTATIVE') AND " @" (NOT %A = 'NON-PARTICIPANT')))" @")" ; And it seems to use directed joins. Not sure, probably a review of all that stuff would make sense. Greets, Helge -- Helge Hess http://www.helgehess.eu/ From users@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 24 02:02:19 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:02:19 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] Conflict Detection (Bug?) In-Reply-To: <5524A92D-4A1D-48BC-825B-88896BFEF5ED@opengroupware.org> References: <1190228723.5829.19.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> <5524A92D-4A1D-48BC-825B-88896BFEF5ED@opengroupware.org> Message-ID: <1190595739.5243.12.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> > > I have user A who is member of team X. > > I create an appointment with a participant of X and a role of > > NON-PARTICIPANT. > > I create an overlapping appointment with a participant of A and a role > > of REQ-PARTICIPANT. > > I see a conflict. > > Is this a bug? My understanding was that a role of NON-PARTICIPANT > > would suppress conflict. > Hm. Possibly. Actually I'm not sure whether groups work with those > extended status codes. (you usually flatten groups when you want to > use the extended stuff because the 'confirm' stuff only makes sense > with individual participants, but of course NON-PARTICIPANT seems > reasonable). Understood, but it would be very useful to support NON-PARTICIPANT for teams since it is an easy and efficient way to push an informational entry onto the calendar view of many/groups-of users. > > The same is true if I create an appointment with A:NON-PARTICIPANT and > > another overlapping appointment with A:REQ-PARTICIPANT. The > > NON-PARTICIPANT appointment sees a conflict with the REQ-PARTICIPANT > > appointment but the REQ-PARTICIPANT does not see a conflict with the > > NON-PARTICIPANT appointment. > > Shouldn't conflicts always appear from both sides? > This is a good question :-) For REQ vs OPT vs NON-PART - probably. > But for status values, I'm not sure - eg if a value is tentative it > might depend which direction you check. I'm good with not support status values for teams, really just interested in the role issue. > > My understanding of conflicts is from the map: > > Conflict-Map as implemented in the conflicts command: > > CHAIR REQ-PART OPT-PART NON-PART > > NEEDS-ACTION yes yes might no yes > > yes yes might no yes > > ACCEPTED yes yes yes no yes > > DECLINED no no no no no > > TENTATIVE yes yes yes no yes > > DELEGATED no no no no no > Puh. This is 3 year old code :-) So, of course there are no bugs... :) > The SQL pattern seems to be this one: > pattern = > @"(%A > %@) AND (%A < %@) " > @"AND (%A = 0 OR %A IS NULL) " > @"AND (%A = 0 OR %A IS NULL) " > @"AND ((%A IN (%@)) AND " > // conflict for NEED-INFO CHAIR and REQ-PART events and then > for all > // ACCEPTED/TENTATIVE events (unless used with a non-part) > // args: stat, stat, role, role, role, stat, stat, role > // TODO: move to an own qualifier which is static and conjoined? > @"(((%A IS NULL OR %A = 'NEEDS-ACTION') AND " > @" (%A = 'CHAIR' OR %A = 'REQ-PARTICIPANT' OR %A IS NULL)) " > @" OR " > @" ((%A = 'ACCEPTED' OR %A = 'TENTATIVE') AND " > @" (NOT %A = 'NON-PARTICIPANT')))" > @")" > ; > And it seems to use directed joins. Not sure, probably a review of > all that stuff would make sense. Ok, I'll see about taking a look. On an aside I've found that LSDateAssignmentCommand does a replace when updating an appointment's participants rather than updating existing records. And the source contains the comment - /* New entry changed since old. We remove the old and add the new, not sure whether this makes sense. Can't we update the old assignment? */ I'm interested in modifying this to perform an actual update of the standing record when a participant is already assigned. We have encountered a couple of instances where updating an appointment can result in loss of the status (accepted, tenative, etc...) information for participants because the client does not supply all the participant's status when doing an update. It would be much nicer if the command left data like role & status as-is if the data is not provided in the update. From users@opengroupware.org Mon Sep 24 10:20:25 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Helge Hess) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:20:25 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] Conflict Detection (Bug?) In-Reply-To: <1190595739.5243.12.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> References: <1190228723.5829.19.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> <5524A92D-4A1D-48BC-825B-88896BFEF5ED@opengroupware.org> <1190595739.5243.12.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> Message-ID: On 24.09.2007, at 03:02, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > I'm interested in modifying this to perform an actual update of the > standing record when a participant is already assigned. Sure, do so. I think the original idea was that the records are immutable to make things easier to synchronize/cache. But I don't think that OGo uses that fact anywhere (though I'm not 100% sure). Helge -- Helge Hess http://www.helgehess.eu/ From users@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 25 21:16:12 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:16:12 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] openSUSE 10.2 RPMs updated Message-ID: <1190751372.5744.17.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> --=-98tjJJpYIf/KRXAdkwRo Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My openSUSE 10.2 RPMs have been updated to OpenGroupware r2030 (which includes zOGI) and SOPE 4.7 r1539. http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/whitemice/ Due to size limits they have been broken into a base bundle (libFoundation, SOPE, etc...) and an application bundle (OpenGroupware itself). It looks like the nightly builds now include packages for openSUSE 10.2 (not certain when those got added) so this is the last time I'll be updating my packages; and I'll probably take them down at some point. --=-98tjJJpYIf/KRXAdkwRo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBG+WyMLRePpNle04MRAug/AJ9oFdJW2yIwkSJihOyotsFRbFRM0ACfe2Ex WXMNLsZdx8tpfo++JVoFoF4= =7G1t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-98tjJJpYIf/KRXAdkwRo-- From users@opengroupware.org Tue Sep 25 22:47:09 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Ernst Murnleitner) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:47:09 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] We have build new theme for ogo 1.1 In-Reply-To: <200709111859.09971.chris123@magma.ca> References: <46DECF76.9060609@cg51.fr> <46E6AB9E.2000505@cg51.fr> <1189547662.5140.3.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> <200709111859.09971.chris123@magma.ca> Message-ID: <1190756829.5283.43.camel@murlix.awite> Hello, Am Dienstag, den 11.09.2007, 18:59 -0400 schrieb chris h: > On Tuesday 11 September 2007 17:54:22 Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > .. You need to contact the owner of the specific icons you are using. From > > the website: "If you want to use icons commercially, you'll have to pay > > the author of the icons or arrange a special arangement with the > > author." This is incompatible with the GPL. > > Actually Im going to have to disagree with this statement. GPL does not speak > to costs, rather to access to code. We had a very similar arrangements on our > product line when I worked for Corel Computer which seems a very long time > ago now. As long as the authors do not put restrictions on commercial > redistribution then its perfectly legitimate I would argue. I cannot agree with you. I think Tauno is correct. Under the GPL it is allowed to charge your customer, this is true. But under the GPL, the one who has got the Software can than sell it or give it away without earning money, just as he wants. And this is clearly not compatible with the above mentioned statement "... to pay the author ...". Summary: You can sell GPL software to a price as high as you want, but your customer can also sell it or even give it away for free! This is at least how I have understood the GPL. Greetings Ernst -- Dr.-Ing. Ernst Murnleitner T +49 8761 722 00 67 F +49 8761 722 00 59 Awite Bioenergie GmbH Firmensitz: Angerstr. 9 a, D-85416 Langenbach Registergericht München, HRB 162652 Geschäftsführer: Dr.-Ing. Martin Grepmeier, Dr. Ing. Ernst Murnleitner *** Als Anti-Spam-Massnahme können uns EMails von Mail-Servern ohne gültigen ptr-record (Reverse DNS) nicht erreichen *** From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 26 02:02:38 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Chris Herrnberger) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:02:38 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] We have build new theme for ogo 1.1 In-Reply-To: <1190756829.5283.43.camel@murlix.awite> References: <46DECF76.9060609@cg51.fr> <200709111859.09971.chris123@magma.ca> <1190756829.5283.43.camel@murlix.awite> Message-ID: <200709252102.38964.chris123@magma.ca> On Tuesday 25 September 2007 17:47:09 Ernst Murnleitner wrote: > I cannot agree with you. I think Tauno is correct. Under the GPL it is > allowed to charge your customer, this is true. But under the GPL, the > one who has got the Software can than sell it or give it away without > earning money, just as he wants. And this is clearly not compatible with > the above mentioned statement "... to pay the author ...". You see I dont agree, as the statement the author provides is open ended. Say I want to use the icons commercially, there is nothing preventing me from doing so once I pay the fee and sign a contract that allows me to resdistribute them at will. Its the later point that is imperative not the former. Statement made by the author are typical of authors who want compensation. Thats OK with me, same for Skyrix. They deserve it. There is nothing in the few words posted by the author that would prevent me from negotiating a contract for a fee that would allow me to distribute the icons once paid for at will. It may cost me losts, but it can be made to work. Is it needed, is an entire other question. My point was simply this. Dont let this minor statement discourage anyone from contacting the author to see whats up based on the above statements. You should not be discourage by some one seeking compensation. Rather make it so that both parties win. Regards -- Chris Herrnberger From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 26 02:41:41 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Helge Hess) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:41:41 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] We have build new theme for ogo 1.1 In-Reply-To: <200709252102.38964.chris123@magma.ca> References: <46DECF76.9060609@cg51.fr> <200709111859.09971.chris123@magma.ca> <1190756829.5283.43.camel@murlix.awite> <200709252102.38964.chris123@magma.ca> Message-ID: <0B7E77B2-A305-4DCE-9E73-91D081237B7D@opengroupware.org> On 26.09.2007, at 03:02, Chris Herrnberger wrote: > My point was simply this. Dont let > this minor statement discourage anyone from contacting the author > to see > whats up based on the above statements. Thats it ;-) Its a bit unfortunate because the original intention/contribution is quite valuable, but we can't just include arbitary derived work. To be part of the basic OGo distribution, we must ensure a certain minimum level of licensing for contributions, which is LGPL. Note that we do *not* require stuff like copyright assignments, we just need a matching license. Actually I wouldn't be against a theme which requires a different license as long as the OGo project can distribute it legally. Which usually still implies that you contact the original authors ... Thanks a lot, Helge -- Helge Hess http://www.helgehess.eu/ From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 26 09:26:33 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Sebastian Reitenbach) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:26:33 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] Automatically Lock an Account on Failed Logins Message-ID: <20070926082634.0DA5A3F0A9@48.53.204.212.ediscom.de> Hi, I took a look at this page: http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/Configurations/FailedLoginLock/view?searchterm=login and have a few questions: 1. Does the administrator has to unlock the account after ogo locked the account, or is it unlocked automatically after MinutesBetweenFailedLogins? 2. I assume there is a mail sent out to notify an Administrator about the locked account, because of the FailedLoginLockInfoMailAddress Default. To whom is mail sent, in case an account is locked? 3. Where does ogo store the failcount? I assume in memory and after a restart the counter are reset to 0? kind regards Sebastian From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 26 11:12:06 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:12:06 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] Automatically Lock an Account on Failed Logins In-Reply-To: <20070926082634.0DA5A3F0A9@48.53.204.212.ediscom.de> References: <20070926082634.0DA5A3F0A9@48.53.204.212.ediscom.de> Message-ID: <1190801526.5702.17.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> > I took a look at this page: > http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/Configurations/FailedLoginLock/view?searchterm=login > and have a few questions: This feature is documented in WMOGAG. http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/whitemice/wmogag/file_view It also doesn't work Implemented in Logic/LSFoundation/OGoContextManager+FailedLogin.m See Logic/LSFoundation/OGoContextManager+FailedLogin.m > 1. Does the administrator has to unlock the account after ogo locked the > account, or is it unlocked automatically after MinutesBetweenFailedLogins? I think it is locked persistently. > 2. I assume there is a mail sent out to notify an Administrator about the > locked account, because of the FailedLoginLockInfoMailAddress Default. To > whom is mail sent, in case an account is locked? Yep, a mail is sent to the administrator., if (LockInfoMail == nil) { LockInfoMail = [[ud objectForKey:@"FailedLoginLockInfoMailAddress"] copy]; if (LockInfoMail == nil) LockInfoMail = @"root"; } ..... [self failLogin_sendInfoMailInCommandContext:cmdCtx to:LockInfoMail from:[root valueForKey:@"email1"] account:_login numberOfFails:FailedCount timeRange:MinutesBetweenFailed]; > 3. Where does ogo store the failcount? I assume in memory and after a > restart the counter are reset to 0? It stores locked status in the isLocked attribute of Person; "is_locked" in the "person" table. It looks like it tries to use the session log to compute the failures. -- Consonance: an Open Source .NET OpenGroupware client. http://code.google.com/p/consonance/ - Searching for a bored Cairo# hacker. Contact:awilliam@whitemiceconsulting.com http://www.opengroupware.org From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 26 11:44:42 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:44:42 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] Automatically Lock an Account on Failed Logins In-Reply-To: <1190801526.5702.17.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> References: <20070926082634.0DA5A3F0A9@48.53.204.212.ediscom.de> <1190801526.5702.17.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> Message-ID: <1190803482.5702.18.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> > > I took a look at this page: > > http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/Configurations/FailedLoginLock/view?searchterm=login > > and have a few questions: > This feature is documented in WMOGAG. > http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/whitemice/wmogag/file_view > It also doesn't work See http://mail.opengroupware.org/pipermail/users/2005-November/014940.html -- Adam Tauno Williams, Systems & Network Administrator Michigan Open Source Group - http://www.mosg.org Whitemice Consulting - http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 26 11:51:52 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Sebastian Reitenbach) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:51:52 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] Automatically Lock an Account on Failed Logins Message-ID: <20070926105152.6D0C33F0F7@48.53.204.212.ediscom.de> Hi Adam, users@opengroupware.org wrote: > > I took a look at this page: > > http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/Configurations/FailedLoginLock/view?searchterm=login > > and have a few questions: > > This feature is documented in WMOGAG. > http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/whitemice/wmogag/file_view unfortunately the chapter "Locking Accounts For Failed Login Attempts" is empty. Nevertheless, I can writeup a littlebit, and send it to you, when I know how it works and that it works, or not works... > > It also doesn't work What do you mean with also? So this feature is just unusable because the lock out does never happen? > > Implemented in Logic/LSFoundation/OGoContextManager+FailedLogin.m > > See Logic/LSFoundation/OGoContextManager+FailedLogin.m I'll need to test, and then maybe take a look at these files. > > > 1. Does the administrator has to unlock the account after ogo locked the > > account, or is it unlocked automatically after MinutesBetweenFailedLogins? > > I think it is locked persistently. > > > 2. I assume there is a mail sent out to notify an Administrator about the > > locked account, because of the FailedLoginLockInfoMailAddress Default. To > > whom is mail sent, in case an account is locked? > > Yep, a mail is sent to the administrator., > > if (LockInfoMail == nil) { > LockInfoMail = [[ud objectForKey:@"FailedLoginLockInfoMailAddress"] > copy]; > if (LockInfoMail == nil) > LockInfoMail = @"root"; > } > ..... > [self failLogin_sendInfoMailInCommandContext:cmdCtx > to:LockInfoMail > from:[root valueForKey:@"email1"] > account:_login > numberOfFails:FailedCount > timeRange:MinutesBetweenFailed]; > > > > 3. Where does ogo store the failcount? I assume in memory and after a > > restart the counter are reset to 0? > > It stores locked status in the isLocked attribute of Person; "is_locked" > in the "person" table. It looks like it tries to use the session log > to compute the failures. ok, so when it is persistently locked via the is_locked column in the database, then the Admin has to reenable the account via the WebUI. That's fine for me. thanks. kind regards Sebastian From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 26 12:02:16 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Helge Hess) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:02:16 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] Automatically Lock an Account on Failed Logins In-Reply-To: <20070926082634.0DA5A3F0A9@48.53.204.212.ediscom.de> References: <20070926082634.0DA5A3F0A9@48.53.204.212.ediscom.de> Message-ID: <09E772ED-4BB3-48E2-9CC2-6D64D1CAD196@opengroupware.org> On 26.09.2007, at 10:26, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > 1. Does the administrator has to unlock the account after ogo > locked the > account, or is it unlocked automatically after > MinutesBetweenFailedLogins? Yes, no. > 2. I assume there is a mail sent out to notify an Administrator > about the > locked account, because of the FailedLoginLockInfoMailAddress > Default. To > whom is mail sent, in case an account is locked? To the email address of the administrator (email1). > 3. Where does ogo store the failcount? In the 'session_log' table. > I assume in memory and after a restart the counter are reset to 0? No. That wouldn't work in multi-instance configurations ... Helge -- Helge Hess http://www.helgehess.eu/ From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 26 12:03:05 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:03:05 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] Automatically Lock an Account on Failed Logins In-Reply-To: <20070926105152.6D0C33F0F7@48.53.204.212.ediscom.de> References: <20070926105152.6D0C33F0F7@48.53.204.212.ediscom.de> Message-ID: <1190804585.5702.21.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> > users@opengroupware.org wrote: > > > I took a look at this page: > http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/Configurations/FailedLoginLock/view?searchterm=login > > > and have a few questions: > > This feature is documented in WMOGAG. > > http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/whitemice/wmogag/file_view > unfortunately the chapter "Locking Accounts For Failed Login Attempts" is > empty. Nevertheless, I can writeup a littlebit, and send it to you, when I > know how it works and that it works, or not works... Because it doesn't work. :) But the section before it on locked accounts applies. > > It also doesn't work > What do you mean with also? So this feature is just unusable because the > lock out does never happen? The lockout never happens. > > It stores locked status in the isLocked attribute of Person; "is_locked" > > in the "person" table. It looks like it tries to use the session log > > to compute the failures. > ok, so when it is persistently locked via the is_locked column in the > database, then the Admin has to reenable the account via the WebUI. That's > fine for me. thanks. Yep, would be a good feature. From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 26 12:20:00 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Sebastian Reitenbach) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:20:00 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] Automatically Lock an Account on Failed Logins Message-ID: <20070926112001.1C9263F100@48.53.204.212.ediscom.de> > > Because it doesn't work. :) But the section before it on locked > accounts applies. I created a bugzilla entry, to not forget it, I hope there is not one already. http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1917 > > > > It also doesn't work > > What do you mean with also? So this feature is just unusable because the > > lock out does never happen? > > The lockout never happens. I'd rather say the logout happens immediately and consequently for everyone ;) > > > > It stores locked status in the isLocked attribute of Person; "is_locked" > > > in the "person" table. It looks like it tries to use the session log > > > to compute the failures. > > ok, so when it is persistently locked via the is_locked column in the > > database, then the Admin has to reenable the account via the WebUI. That's > > fine for me. thanks. > > Yep, would be a good feature. I think so too, I hope I'll find some time to take a look at the source to figure out what is going wrong there. kind regards Sebastian From users@opengroupware.org Wed Sep 26 12:40:51 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:40:51 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] Automatically Lock an Account on Failed Logins In-Reply-To: <20070926112001.1C9263F100@48.53.204.212.ediscom.de> References: <20070926112001.1C9263F100@48.53.204.212.ediscom.de> Message-ID: <1190806851.5702.32.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> > > Because it doesn't work. :) But the section before it on locked > > accounts applies. > I created a bugzilla entry, to not forget it, I hope there is not one > already. > http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1917 I thought there was but can't find it. > > > > It also doesn't work > > > What do you mean with also? So this feature is just unusable because the > > > lock out does never happen? > > The lockout never happens. > I'd rather say the logout happens immediately and consequently for > everyone ;) > > > > It stores locked status in the isLocked attribute of > Person; "is_locked" > > > > in the "person" table. It looks like it tries to use the session log > > > > to compute the failures. > > > ok, so when it is persistently locked via the is_locked column in the > > > database, then the Admin has to reenable the account via the WebUI. > That's > > > fine for me. thanks. > > Yep, would be a good feature. > I think so too, I hope I'll find some time to take a look at the source to > figure out what is going wrong there. From users@opengroupware.org Fri Sep 28 09:34:28 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Sebastian Reitenbach) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:34:28 +0200 Subject: [OGo-Users] strange ordering of appointments Message-ID: <20070928083429.117173F6E8@48.53.204.212.ediscom.de> Hi list, I recognized that the sort order of appointments in the WebUI is sometimes not correct. I have seen the wrong order, an appointment starting e.g. 14:00 is listed behind an appointment that starts e.g. 18:00, under the following conditions: 1. The later appointment is "old", that means, created some weeks ago 2. the earlier appointment is "new", that means, just created 3. both appointments are not whole day, but in the afternoon (appointments in the morning doesn't seem to have that problem) 4. you have to have the "all intranet" team view, week overview (switching to an other team, where participants are on both appointments, then the sort order changes to the correct one), also other teams with a large number of members seem to have the same problem, but the count of members doesn't seem to be the problem, but the count of appointments by the members of the team seem to be the problem. E.g. I have a team, with 60 members, where the sort order is mixed up, then I exchange some members, and the sort order is fixed. This was reproducible by exchanging the same accounts. It might have sth. to do with the appointment assignment. There were the same number of appointments on that day with both test group, so I assume the number of appointments per day does not matter. 5. the day overview does not seem to have that problem has someone seen this before, or can try to reproduce it? I just only walked back two weeks and created an appointment for me, took the "all intranet" week overview and saw the appointment order mixed up. I have seen this behavior on opensuse 10.1 with OGo, 1.1.6-r1764.0, and on opensuse 10.2 with OGo r1949.1, both using the same database. kind regards Sebastian From users@opengroupware.org Fri Sep 28 17:01:26 2007 From: users@opengroupware.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:01:26 -0400 Subject: [OGo-Users] strange ordering of appointments In-Reply-To: <20070928083429.117173F6E8@48.53.204.212.ediscom.de> References: <20070928083429.117173F6E8@48.53.204.212.ediscom.de> Message-ID: <1190995286.5157.21.camel@aleph.wmmi.net> > I recognized that the sort order of appointments in the WebUI is sometimes > not correct. I have seen the wrong order, an appointment starting e.g. 14:00 > is listed behind an appointment that starts e.g. 18:00, under the following > conditions: > 1. The later appointment is "old", that means, created some weeks ago > 2. the earlier appointment is "new", that means, just created > 3. both appointments are not whole day, but in the afternoon (appointments > in the morning doesn't seem to have that problem) > 4. you have to have the "all intranet" team view, week overview (switching > to an other team, where participants are on both appointments, then the sort > order changes to the correct one), also other teams with a large number of > members seem to have the same problem, but the count of members doesn't seem > to be the problem, but the count of appointments by the members of the team > seem to be the problem. E.g. I have a team, with 60 members, where the sort > order is mixed up, then I exchange some members, and the sort order is > fixed. This was reproducible by exchanging the same accounts. It might have > sth. to do with the appointment assignment. There were the same number of > appointments on that day with both test group, so I assume the number of > appointments per day does not matter. > 5. the day overview does not seem to have that problem > has someone seen this before, or can try to reproduce it? I haven't noticed it, but I almost exclusively use the month view. I'll try to test it. Would be useful to run your test with SQL debugging enabled to see if there is ordering in the query. > I just only walked > back two weeks and created an appointment for me, took the "all intranet" > week overview and saw the appointment order mixed up. > I have seen this behavior on opensuse 10.1 with OGo, 1.1.6-r1764.0, and on > opensuse 10.2 with OGo r1949.1, both using the same database.