[OGo-Users] We have build new theme for ogo 1.1

[Chris Herrnberger]

On Tuesday 25 September 2007 17:47:09 Ernst Murnleitner wrote:

> I cannot agree with you. I think Tauno is correct. Under the GPL it is
> allowed to charge your customer, this is true. But under the GPL, the
> one who has got the Software can than sell it or give it away without
> earning money, just as he wants. And this is clearly not compatible with
> the above mentioned statement "... to pay the author ...".

You see I dont agree, as the statement the author provides is open ended. Say 
I want to use the icons commercially, there is nothing preventing me from 
doing so once I pay the fee and sign a contract that allows me to 
resdistribute them at will. Its the later point that is imperative not the 
former. 

Statement made by the author are typical of authors who want compensation. 
Thats OK with me, same for Skyrix. They deserve it. There is nothing in the 
few words posted by the author that would prevent me from negotiating a 
contract for a fee that would allow me to distribute the icons once paid for 
at will. It may cost me losts, but it can be made to work. 

Is it needed, is an entire other question. My point was simply this. Dont let 
this minor statement discourage anyone from contacting the author to see 
whats up based on the above statements. You should not be discourage by some 
one seeking compensation. Rather make it so that both parties win. 

Regards
-- 
Chris Herrnberger