[OGo-Users] URLs Accessible from ZideStore
Kianha x
users@opengroupware.org
Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:20:35 +0200
------=_Part_4816_19978352.1209115235350
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
2008/4/24, Adam Tauno Williams <adam@morrison-ind.com>:
>
>
> > What version do you have installed? It looks like this was fixed
> > recently (r2097: Mar 11 18:47:07 2008 UTC)
>
>
> The above was in reference to what version of *OpenGrouwpare* you have
> and the availability of the Tasks folder.
My version of OpenGroupware is 1.1 svn 2065-1.
> I have tested with jakarta-slide-webdavlib-2.1.jar and Bitkinex 2.9.3
> > (trial). Using jakarta-slide-webdavlib-2.1 when I dowload a file, It
> > sends more of 100 messages, so I think that's the reason of slow time
> > of dowload, isn't it? How can I reduce the download time?
>
>
> Yep, lots of round trips makes things slower. But it shouldn't be too
> bad. For example: I can request an event from the server and it takes
> about 1/10th of a second. Thus you can request 600 appointments in a
> minute.
>
> $time curl -u adam:* http://.../zidestore/dav/adam/Calendar/11081036
> ...
> real 0m0.113s
> user 0m0.004s
> sys 0m0.008s
>
> Almost anything WebDAV can be tested with curl, it is a very good way
> to check if the slowdown is your client/assembly or the serve. See
> <http://mail.opengroupware.org/pipermail/users/2008-April/018786.html>
>
> There is a dirty trick to request multiple objects at a time. You can
> use multiple object ids separated by an underscore to request up to 64
> objects at a time. See
> <http://mail.opengroupware.org/pipermail/users/2005-November/015088.html>
>
> I want to test with caldav to know if the performance is better than
> > webdav, but I don't find much information. I can't connect to
> > opengroupware with webdav (I have downloaded caldav4j-0.3.jar). Can
> > someone help me?
>
>
> CalDAV is WebDAV with extra trappings (more or less).
So, I suppose that the performance of WebDAV is similar to the performance
of CalDAV, don't I?
There have been a couple of reports that Apache's "KeepAliveTimeout"
> making things slow way down. Ideally one should set nokeepalive for
> WebDAV clients.
>
> Example: BrowserMatch "BionicMessage\.net GroupDAV" nokeepalive
>
>
> > Also I have test with JGroupdav and the download time is superior.
>
>
> So, if you use JGroupdav your performance is better? You can enable a
> trace of the back-n-forth between the client and the server; this is
> described in WMOGAG. This might point one what differences there are
> between the various WebDAV client libraries.
No, If I use JGroupdav my performance is worse.
> Can someone give suggestions to improve the performance in the manage
> > files via WebDAV?
>
>
> Are you managing files as in documents or managing contacts/etc... via
> WebDAV (GroupDAV)?
I am based in files .ics and .vcf , I need to obtain contacts, appointments
and tasks. I use this type of files I don't know if it is posible to manage
them of other way...
--
> OpenGroupware.org Users
> users@opengroupware.org
> http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
------=_Part_4816_19978352.1209115235350
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi, <br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2008/4/24, Adam Tauno Williams <<a href="mailto:adam@morrison-ind.com">adam@morrison-ind.com</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br> > What version do you have installed? It looks like this was fixed<br> > recently (r2097: Mar 11 18:47:07 2008 UTC)<br> <br> <br>The above was in reference to what version of *OpenGrouwpare* you have<br> and the availability of the Tasks folder.</blockquote>
<div><br>My version of OpenGroupware is 1.1 svn 2065-1. <br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> > I have tested with jakarta-slide-webdavlib-2.1.jar and Bitkinex 2.9.3<br>
> (trial). Using jakarta-slide-webdavlib-2.1 when I dowload a file, It<br> > sends more of 100 messages, so I think that's the reason of slow time<br> > of dowload, isn't it? How can I reduce the download time?<br>
<br> <br>Yep, lots of round trips makes things slower. But it shouldn't be too<br> bad. For example: I can request an event from the server and it takes<br> about 1/10th of a second. Thus you can request 600 appointments in a<br>
minute.<br> <br> $time curl -u adam:* http://.../zidestore/dav/adam/Calendar/11081036<br> ...<br> real 0m0.113s<br> user 0m0.004s<br> sys 0m0.008s<br> <br> Almost anything WebDAV can be tested with curl, it is a very good way<br>
to check if the slowdown is your client/assembly or the serve. See<br> <<a href="http://mail.opengroupware.org/pipermail/users/2008-April/018786.html">http://mail.opengroupware.org/pipermail/users/2008-April/018786.html</a>><br>
<br> There is a dirty trick to request multiple objects at a time. You can<br> use multiple object ids separated by an underscore to request up to 64<br> objects at a time. See<br> <<a href="http://mail.opengroupware.org/pipermail/users/2005-November/015088.html">http://mail.opengroupware.org/pipermail/users/2005-November/015088.html</a>><br>
</blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> > I want to test with caldav to know if the performance is better than<br> > webdav, but I don't find much information. I can't connect to<br>
> opengroupware with webdav (I have downloaded caldav4j-0.3.jar). Can<br> > someone help me?<br> <br> <br>CalDAV is WebDAV with extra trappings (more or less).</blockquote><div><br>So, I suppose that the performance of WebDAV is similar to the performance of CalDAV, don't I?<br>
</div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> There have been a couple of reports that Apache's "KeepAliveTimeout"<br>
making things slow way down. Ideally one should set nokeepalive for<br> WebDAV clients.<br> <br> Example: BrowserMatch "BionicMessage\.net GroupDAV" nokeepalive<br> <br><br> > Also I have test with JGroupdav and the download time is superior.<br>
<br> <br>So, if you use JGroupdav your performance is better? You can enable a<br> trace of the back-n-forth between the client and the server; this is<br> described in WMOGAG. This might point one what differences there are<br>
between the various WebDAV client libraries.</blockquote><div><br>No, If I use JGroupdav my performance is worse.<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
> Can someone give suggestions to improve the performance in the manage<br> > files via WebDAV?<br> <br> <br>Are you managing files as in documents or managing contacts/etc... via<br> WebDAV (GroupDAV)?</blockquote>
<div><br>I am based in files .ics and .vcf , I need to obtain contacts, appointments and tasks. I use this type of files I don't know if it is posible to manage them of other way... <br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
--<br> OpenGroupware.org Users<br> <a href="mailto:users@opengroupware.org">users@opengroupware.org</a><br> <a href="http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/users">http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>
------=_Part_4816_19978352.1209115235350--