[OGo-Users] Re: [OGo-Developer] Changes to trunk, Testing

[Helge Hess]

On 08.02.2008, at 21:05, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
>> I think it would be more useful to persist the fact that the user
>> selected a 'group' (hence doesn't care which projector he gets).
> but they run into resource conflicts, where they doesn't really need  
> to.

Why would they run into resource conflicts if the category is saved  
and a resource of the category is available?


>> Its very unlikely that I will add an amount.
> hmm, why not, what would it cost, it would allow all above mentioned  
> stuff?

I've already explained why, and Adam elaborated further on that.

I can envision some setups where it _might_ make sense (when there are  
really _large_ quantaties of equal objects, eg chairs in a conference  
room), but as Adam suggests this is really overkill and probably a  
different software altogether (inventory management).


Resources require a rework anyways. Its more likely that resources  
will become another SQL-view on top of the company table to enhance  
consistency with iCalendar. The 'kits' would probably become  
resource-'teams' quite naturally. Not sure how one would represent  
resource categories. We'll see once we actually implement it ...

Thanks,
   Helge
-- 
Helge Hess
http://www.helgehess.eu/