users@opengroupware.org wrote: > On 07.03.2008, at 13:06, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > Meanwhile I raised it to 800 > > or such, that should be sufficient for a while ;) > > > I think it might make more sense to try to lower > LSSessionChannelTimeOut, eg -LSSessionChannelTimeOut 20. when I run into that trouble again, then I'll try that. thanks Sebastian